1 yr. ago • 95%

In a historic about-face, Apple publicly supports right-to-repair bill

grist.org In a historic about-face, Apple publicly supports right-to-repair bill

The iPhone maker now says repair access "is good for consumers’ budgets and good for the environment."

Technology @beehaw.org In a historic about-face, Apple publicly supports right-to-repair bill

40 comments

I’m sure they’ll find a way to sell their components at full price just like what they do right now. They’ll surely keep their DRMs in place and prevent repairs with other components.

If they support it, it is because they modified it enough so that they benefit from it.

75
- Agreed. But then it's not actually right to repair. Right to repair means you need to be able to complete a repair on your own, and that includes any software needed to pair your parts, components, etc.
  
  So if Apple messes with the bill, I hope that is made obvious by Right to Repair advocates and blows up in Apple's face.
  
  3
Yeah right to repair your buggy USB in your MacBook by replacing its motherboard.

16
Just to make it useless like in NYC?

16
Any idea what prompted this about face?

16
- They know the way the wind is blowing on this issue, and they trade in public image nearly as much as they do in physical goods. This is a good look for them, and when it was clear they wouldn’t win, they’re happy to join the winning side.
  
  It’s also not completely out of left field—they’ve been expanding access to previously-internal repair guides and even tools over the last few years.
  
  37
  
  Many years ago, I read that the first rule of diplomacy is to assent graciously to the inevitable. :)
  
  18
  
  They've done pr things before too. The apple certified repair program is incredibly restrictive and expensive, the existing self repair even more so. So I'll look at what they're saying very carefully and critically.
  
  5
- Pessimistic: Apple lawyers have arguments prepared that DRM'ing individual components does not violate this law.
  
  Less Pessimistic: Apple got a sufficient head start in supporting third-party repairs that it would be beneficial for them to get this law passed so that other manufacturers scramble to catch up.
  
  15
  
  Not DRM, but Apple does signing of components.
  
  Apple doesn’t care because they already set their self repair program up exactly the way this legislation states. If you buy certain components you have to contact them for assistance activating them.
  
  4
  
  Good points. It may also be that someone else is already out in front of this, and Apple is trying to catch up.
  
  1
- The last time it failed it was supposed to come back with allowing modules instead of parts. Apple would be fine with selling "modules" as they consider their devices to be top case, bottom case, motherboard, battery, and screen (has stuff attached.) If they can have a needs calibration some where to shame 3rd party repairs and not allow board level repair it is just what they wanted.
  
  11
  
  Fair point.
  
  4
- They're probably trying to get ahead of legislation.
  
  8
  
  Or at least not be seen as losing this fight. They’ve apparently decided that this is not the hill to die on.
  
  4
- Permanently Deleted
  
  5
  
  I suspect you're right.
  
  2
- This is the...3rd? 4th? time they've "about faced" on R2R. It's a sham. Every time.
  
  4
I haven't gotten a chance to look at it yet, but Lewis Rossmann's comments are usually very helpful for things like this. I don't know what apple is playing at.

https://youtu.be/0tB3t7xGWjk?si=WuNaLDG3JezU0Rwn

14
- Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/0tB3t7xGWjk?si=WuNaLDG3JezU0Rwn
  
  Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
  
  I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
  
  5
  
  Good bot
  
  1
Uh oh...

13
What about battery, ram and storage in laptops?

Right to repair doesn’t mean you can.

7
- Right to repair means you have access to the parts and software tools needed to do the repair. So for Apple, that would mean battery, RAM, and storage modules, plus any software needed to pair things.
  
  So if you don't have the skills or equipment to repair your laptop yourself, you could at least go to a selection of independent repair shops that do.
  
  5
  
  That would be great. But Apple has fused all these things together on the motherboard so that … well … they can only be replace outright vs repaired.
  
  I don’t mind cpu / mobo fusing but storage and ram is just a kick in the ass. It really is a shame.
  
  3
Good as everyone should be able to try to do some repairs when something is broken.

But programmed obsolescence is even worse as you have perfectly working devices which you can’t use anymore because they are officially not supported (by an os for instance).

4
The same way I am extremely skeptical on macrohard supporting right to repair bills, I am very skeptical of appl€ doing the exact same thing. Ain't no way they ain't gonna spin it in a way that forces you to either be stuck with macO$ or Bimbows so they can shut out both gøøgl€ and Linux/BSD/whatever else.

1

You've viewed 40 comments.