Announcing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternative
https:// ibis.wiki /article/Announcing_Ibis,_the_federated_Wikipedia_Alternative Announcing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternative
maybe we could use this to collect guerilla gardening strategies or something?
... doesn't this already exist?
I mean to say, anyone can already start a website and call it a wiki, set whatever policies they want, synchronize with other websites via RSS feed or whatever, and open it to editing by anyone and everyone (or no one) they choose.
And anyone does. There are hundreds of thousands of wikis out there.
The point of decentralization and federation was to merge the benefits of personal websites - privacy and personal control of your data - with the communication and collaboration powers of centralized social media. So your account is hosted on your instance and under your control and then you can go post on a thousand other instances with that same account. And I don't think it's failed in that.
But wikis are already personal websites. And if somebody wants to federate a wiki they can host it on the same server they have their Lemmy instance on and put a link on the Lemmy homepage.
And the idea that a bunch of people hosting their own wikis with no correction or accountability mechanisms will be less corrupt and have less disinformation then those same people working together to build consensus on the same website? Not persuasive, is all I'm saying.
39I can see the benefit for when different groups of Wikipedia editors have differing policy opinions where for an average user both the fork and the original are perfectly fine but now information is in both places or worse some in one and some in the other, especially for cross linking purposes. Wikipedia can hyperlink to wookiepedia for star wars stuff and wookiepedia can hyperlink to the aaroads wiki when referencing highways for example. It all become one much larger wiki effectively.
On the other hand, part of the draw of Wikipedia is the extremely high editing and page creation standards that has led to such a high quality source of information
Edit to add a positive and a negative:
I can see a federated wiki being very good for project wikis especially when linking to other projects, as well as for some level of redundancy
But also this is being developed by one of the 2 Lemmy developers, who still haven't implemented many of the needed moderation and administration tools for Lemmy
12All good points, except the existing software does not have that developers name attached to it.
10
Am I the only person concerned that one of only two developers on Lemmy has started a new, massive undertaking, basically building a new lemmy?
22i wouldn't sweat it, they really didn't build lemmy either. :D
4To be fair, building a platform like Lemmy is a shit tonne of work. It's not built yet, and it's not their fault tens of thousands of redditors decided to start using an unfinished product.
However, this is exactly why I'm concerned. If they were making a little calculator app or something then no concerns. But they are trying to build another federated service like Lemmy. If it takes off like Lemmy, how can they possibly give attention to both?
10
I was able to complete a proof of concept in a relatively short time of four months
Interesting that they don't have time to add decent moderation tools, but do have time for this.
4Its free, open source software folks. Its fine to not be happy about a projects direction, but these comments are really treading the "I payed them $0 and I demand my moneys worth!" line.
He spent 4 months working on another free, open source project bexause he wanted to. That's perfectly fair on his part. Working for $0 on things you want to work on is a sane and basic right we all have. The work may even help lemmy in an as yet unknown way.
You are as equally free as the lemmy dev to work on moderation tools. The fact that you have put in the same amount of work as the dev should tamp down the criticism a ways.
Now if you donate to the lemmy devs directly, fire away. If you want to contribute directly, Rust is an excellent programming language that fits very well with the solarpunk ethos. It's incredibly efficient, so code uses less power than alternates, it's memory safe, so it by default eliminates 75% of the most common computer bugs, leading to safety, stability and reliability of the products it runs on, and its community is enthusiastic, which should ensure its longevity for decades to come. Learning it might be a good avenue if you want to help lemmy.
23
We have a work in progress wiki here https://wiki.slrpnk.net
I completed the account integration with Lemmy yesterday and we will likely make an official announcement for it in the next monthly post.
But basically every community on slrpnk has their own namespace on it and moderators of those communities have edit rights.
17today I learned - that's a hella cool project. keep it up
5The wiki looks great! i was so excited to see some of the things I wrote in the code of conduct
As always thanks for all the work you do running the instance :)
1
On Reddit a lot of communities had wikis to explain some core concepts. I feel this might be good alternative for this kind of stuff for lemmy. Especially if user accounts can be synced.
12Seems broken for me:
Edit: It's fixed!
10Yeah, it hasn't been optimised for mobile. Just a proof of concept I'm pretty sure
5Permanently Deleted
-1