Linux Mint 22 Adopts PipeWire, New Linux Kernel Cadence - OMG! Ubuntu
Linux Mint 22 Adopts PipeWire, New Linux Kernel Cadence - OMG! Ubuntu
A slew of modernisation are set to ship in next version of Linux Mint, which will be based on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. First up, Linux Mint 22 will switch to
Nice! The outdated kernel was one of the main reasons why I never recommended using Mint. Now, if they can do something about their other outdated packages like Mesa - and switch to Wayland - I'd be happy to recommend Mint.
41They have the edge kernel, which is not exatly the latest and greatest but should be new enough.
I think their focus is having things that doesn't break and requires no tweaking.
I have to ask: what are you and your friends running that doesn't work with kernel 5.15? FYI, I got a Thinkpad T14 Gen 3 running Mint with no issue.
8Running recent AMD hardware and gaming. I have a ThinkPad Z13 with a Zen 3+ APU, a performance-oriented homelab machine with a recent Zen 4 APU, and a Zen 2 gaming desktop with a recent AMD GPU.
For the laptop, my main concerns are battery life, desktop responsiveness and gaming performance. As you may or may not be aware, the AMD space has seen a flurry of development activity these past couple of years thanks to Valve and the Steam Deck. There have been several improvements in the power management aspect in recent kernels, specifically the AMD p-state EPP driver. For desktop responsiveness, the new EEVDF scheduler has been a groundbreaking improvement over the old CFS scheduler. Finally, for gaming, there have been tons of performance improvements and bug fixes in the Mesa and Vulkan drivers, and as a laptop gamer I always aim to squeeze every bit of FPS I can get out of it. For some games, a recent Mesa makes a huge difference.
I also appreciate the improvements to the in-kernel NTFS3 driver since kernel 6.2 (where some important mount options were added) and most recently (tail end of 6.7) a bunch of bug fixes were also merged. I use an NTFS-formatted external drive for archival and file sharing between different machines (I also use macOS and Windows, hence why I went with NTFS), so any improvements to the NTFS3 driver is something I look forward to.
Next is my homelab setup, it's recent bleeding edge AMD hardware which runs a ton of VMs (Openshift container platform, Docker, Postgres and a bunch of web apps). When I'm working on it, I also use it for dev stuff and some work stuff - whilst all the VMs and containers are running in the background. So once again, I'm looking for stuff like EEVDF for desktop responsiveness, but also improvements to KVM or virtualisation performance in general. I'm also really excited for the upcoming kernel 6.9, because of the KSMBD and bcachefs improvements - particularly the latter, since I intended to evaluate a tiered storage setup using bcachefs, and if it's any good, I'll make the switch from btrfs.
Finally, for my gaming PC - obviously I'm always after the latest Mesa and Vulkan improvements, as well as overall desktop responsiveness and performance. In addition, I also care about things like VRR and HDR support, and all the Wayland-related improvements across the spectrum. All of which have seen vast improvements in recent times.
I mainly run Arch (with Cachy repos), which allows me to use optimised x86-64-v3/v4 packages for the best performance, as well as special AMD-GPU optimised Mesa/vulkan/vdpau/vaapi drivers which is available only for Arch (as far as I'm aware; but maybe there's a PPA for *buntu as well?). In any case, with Arch I'm able to easily fine-tune and get the most out of my systems.
So there you go, this is why I chase after recent packages and why Mint isn't suitable for me. I know if you wanted to, Mint users could subscribe to PPAs like Oibaf or something, or manually install recent kernels, but then you'd break the system and that defeats the whole point of Mint's focus on stability. On the other hand, I don't mind recommending it for someone who's main use case is primarily home-office/web browsing etc and they have an older system. But for power users, gamers, or those who have recent hardware, I definitely cannot recommend Mint in good faith.
12
I'll start using Mint... heck, any version of Linux... as soon as they introduce a proper UI for a plethora of system settings. If I ever have to use a command line for anything but THE most esoteric, potentially system-damaging scenarios, the O/s has failed in my book. (Windows user since 3.1, never lasted more than a day with Linux)
-10Bull fucking shit if you used windows in the old days you must have had a foot stuck up MSDOS 's 16bit ass
12If I ever have to use a command line for anything but THE most esoteric, potentially system-damaging scenarios
But you don't have to though, at least if you're running a sensible distro and have Linux-friendly hardware. My elderly parents for instance have been running Linux for over a decade now (Xubuntu first, now Zorin) - on bog standard Dell machines - and never once had to touch the command-line. I think I intervened a couple of times a maybe 4 or 5+ years ago, but haven't had to any major tech support or CLI intervention in the few years.
Linux has come a long way. If you've got compatible hardware and don't have any specific proprietary sofeare requirements (like Adobe etc), then I'd recommend giving it a try. If you're open-minded that is.
10Windows settings are notoriously confusing, and absolute majority of things can currently be resolved in various Linux environments via GUI.
I honestly don't remember when I last opened the terminal. Using Manjaro KDE on my main machine right now.
1
I no longer use Linux Mint, but I really enjoyed the decade I spent on it. The kernel change seems like a good move considering Mint is targeted towards desktop users.
28So what made you switch after so long?
8Haha Mint was my first distro! I wiped Windows 7 and installed Mint, then quickly learned that a tarball is in fact more work than an exe. Good times and a great learning experience! Back then it was the only thing not slow, ugly, or wildly unfamiliar.
8
Are these rolling out to LMDE?
18LMDE is already on pipewire as far as I can tell. I have a process running by that name, as well as one called
pipewire-pulsewhich I assume is providing some or all of the old pulseaudio functionality for whatever might be expecting it.No problems I'm aware of. I thought I was having problems early last month, but that turned out to be hardware failure.
21That's great to hear! Thanks
4
They didnt use Pipewire before??
18was not ready you had to use a PPA to make it work well.
9Lolz
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultPipeWire
I know that Fedora does breaking changes and basically beta tests, but Pipewire "just works" since at least 2 years
6
Yes, they did. I'm using Mint 21.2 Xfce with Pipewire "factory" installed.
2
pipewire was the smoothest transition ive ever experienced in linux, and fixed most of my grief with the audio subsystem. mint always takes its sweet time and i feel like this should have happened much sooner, but better late than never.
14Fuckyeah. I need it, so I had to jump through a couple of hoops to get it running on LM21, but good to know that it's default next time I need to install.
7As someone who has pulse just the way they want it, what will this mean for me?
Is it a forced change on a current install?
Is there an equivalent to PulseEffects for PipeWire?
7There's Easyeffects. I don't know if it is equivalent but it certainly has more features than I could ever hope to be able to use.
8There's a compability layer, generally called
pipewire-pulse. I think it's not a one-for-one copy, but it works great for desktop applications that expect pulse.Some things that previously were pulseaudio modules, like rtp and raop (airplay), have been reimplemented as native pipewire modules, I believe.
More complicated setups I can't personally speak to, but since pipewire is also catered towards professional audio workflows (as opposed to just desktop audio), you should at least be able to replicate what you have now.
And, as others have already pointed out, pulseeffects has been long dead, and now lives on as easyeffects.
7PulseEffects is still working fine for me is why I was asking. Been using it for the past year after making the switch.
3
I find Easy effects is much more feature rich easier to import APO files and such
4
I switched my Mint install to Pipewire already. Just hope that won't mess up the upgrade.
4In my experience, it probably will. I've learned to just leave stuff alone and let the distro people handle it all. They know their own distro way better than me.
9Ah well. I guess a reinstall every couple of years or so isn't such a bad thing.
4
You can come back to pulseaudio and delete all your pipewire configs before upgrading.
2
Man just when audio in Linux got decently stable and functional, now we have to switch to some new shit. I run Ubuntu 23.10 that has pipewire and mostly it works but then sometimes it starts crackling, audio turns on and off, skipping, or random muting.
I'm getting so fucking fed up with these stupid Linux desktop pre-alpha software that take a decade to stabilize and by then we're off to the brand new thing that barely functions.
-17In my experience, pipewire is leagues ahead of pulseaudio and just works. All the issues I had with pulseaudio are resolved with pipewire and it sounds better as well with the default settings.
64It's kind of funny how I keep reading this exact sentence over and over again
All the issues I had with pulseaudio are resolved with pipewire
just because I had issues with Alsa, and they were all resolved by pulseaudio, which just works for me.
Perhaps I should try PipeWire.
7
Well....have you filed bugs for your issues?
Most people have had a very smooth transition over to Pipewire. I have 4 Arch machines and Pipewire has been flawless. I am even using one machine for pro-audio usecases (REAPER, Ardour).
24Pipewire its cool regarding pulse but the crackling issue its a thing, well known from what I've seen.
2
Sounds like a problem specific to your hardware/setup. I've never had any issues with pipewire.
11I switched over to pipewire for my audio nearly 2 years a go and had 0 problems migrating from pluse to pipewire in Arch btw. You'll be running an even newer version so it will be just be a drop in replacement and the worst you'll have to do is restart the pipewire service when you install it or just reboot.
11Pipewire is so much better and it works like a switchboard for audio and even video. It has been stable for a few years now.
Also I've never had an issue with Pulseaudio that was a bug. The problem with pulse is that it doesn't do multiple devices well.
10This is why I'm no longer upgrading to non-LTS releases. They add the new stuff in those, the good souls that use them test it and by the time it gets to the LTS, things generally work fine. I think PipeWire will replace PulseAudio in 24.04. It's had a good run while it lasted. 15 years of mainstream use. ☺️👏
7I'm so fed up, I'd rather spend money on the development of something that locks me in instead of spending money on opensource!!!!
at the same time
How come opensource is in "pre-alpha" all the time?
3That's something i've been occasionally experiencing with my Amerano usb as well. Though it's a kernel related problem, because switching to pulse does not solve it, booting up a 18Lts iso does.
In fact it's a bit better on pipewire and you can also experiment with a low latency kernel.
2