Should it just be called JASM?
Should it just be called JASM?
So much better now
JAVA: Just Another Version of Assembly
41ReplyWASM, also known as Javascript Java
20ReplyDo we have 3 assemblies now?
14ReplyActual assembly in mainstream use:
x86
arm
risc vmainstream byte code:
jvm
.net (I think)
wasmfake assembly people may write:
llvm
wasmwat (web assembly text) is actually written is S-expressions, like lisp but without code as data.
Edit: formatting
33Reply.NET thing is called
IL
15Reply
I'm making my own, because all mainstream options are bloated for my usecase...
12ReplyHow many do you want?
6ReplyOne. To rule them all.
8ReplyYou forgot CC :)
3Reply
I hate Java because whenever people make games or performance sensitive applications with it, performance is always complete ass shit. On top of that, it seems I always have to cave in and use Windows because when I'm trying to compile a Java project, there's some obscure dependency can only be acquired and installed correctly on windows.
Try compiling Freerouting in anything other than Windows for example. It's a good fucking thing Java apps are cross platform.
13ReplyIt’s a good fucking thing Java apps are cross platform.
Or so goes the promise 😅
Does Freerouting use libs with JNI or something? How does it not compile on linux?
Anti Commercial AI thingy
0Reply
Don't give Java the credit of inventing bytecode, it's a much cooler concept than that
10ReplyAs with most things, it was invented in the 70s or 80s only to be reinvented again later.
Anti Commercial AI thingy
1Reply
Remember kids, JSON was almost called JSML
10ReplyWait, are you serious? 😅
Anti Commercial AI thingy
-4Reply
Java applets from 20 years: what am I to you?
9ReplyPlease AppleSoft BASIC was doing bytecode before Java was a gleam in a programmers eye.
3Reply