Woman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AI
Woman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AI
Suzi Dougherty’s photograph of 18-year-old Caspar deemed ‘suspicious’ by judges, even though it was taken on her mobile
Technology @lemmy.world Woman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AI | Suzi Dougherty’s photograph of 18-year-old Caspar deemed ‘suspicious’ by judges, even though it was ... 
Old news - she was taking Omega 3 capsules. Omega 3 comes from fish oil, and helps your brain develop, thus enhancing your intelligence and possibly making you more 'arty'.
The competition refuses to accept photos enhanced by arty fish-oil intelligence.
123Take my upvote and get outta here
16This is a red hot comment
14Ugh. The amateur comedians are here. Keep that on Reddit.
-33Yes, there must be no humour on the fediverse.
28Oh no I just went on Reddit and they banned me for being too funny 🫨
14Permanently Deleted
13
Nothing about that looks like AI to me, beyond the uncanny valley feeling and the eerie lighting. The wallpaper and tile alone would be a big headache to get that consistent, especially with the mirror there. Same goes for the pattern on the clothes and the anatomy (hands, anyone?).
38That annoys me, they lost because "might be AI" are you kidding me? The photo does not look AI to me at all. If the photo was edited through photoshop or went through an art program couldn't they have just asked for the original? That must've been infuriating.
38Just check the mirrors man, perfect likeness. I don't think any genai is there yet.
13Also if it is real, surely they can just prove it by sharing where the picture is taken?
Edit: apparently it was taken at a Gucci exhibition. Surely that's enough info to double check?
7
guardian? Naa - probably bullshit.
-17Guardian is the only news outlet in the UK worth reading. But their quality has been on the decline.
12The Guardian is the only mainstream centrist outlet we have left, everything else has lurched towards (or has always been on) the right-wing. And before anyone says the Guardian is a lefty paper, you only need to look at their coverage of the Labour party during the Corbyn years to know they would back the LibDems in a heartbeat if they weren't such a colossal joke.
6
Why?
6