rollin' coal

When our living conditions deteriorate gradually, we adapt to these conditions instead of fixing of them. But sudden threats get sorted out immediately.

Coal has done far more damage than nuclear energy ever will, but coal has over 2300 stations worldwide and nuclear has 400.

A perfect example of the 'Boiling Frog Syndrome'.

rich bastards claiming that windmills would harm them through visual pollution.

you fucking fuckwits, smog is visual pollution. But they don't care.

inb4 comment section full of uncited factoids and personal attacks

I have a Prius. Not for any stupid "I'm saving the planet despite still driving an ICE car" reasons, because I save a lot on gas.

Doesn't stop every "rollin' coal" asshole from doing it when they drive by me because "haw haw dumb librul hippie." You sure showed me by spending a lot more on gas than I do.

ok real talk. 3 mile island reportedly had no result on the environment, on account of being fully contained. Chernobyl was significant, obviously.

Fukushima as far as we can tell today, has no significant long lasting effects. Notably i've read that rates of certain cancers in areas surrounding the plant did rise, but i've also heard that it was still below the nominal expected rate. So nothing of significant concern. The local sea life near to the plant could very well be an issue, but we don't really have much data on that at the moment. Especially now that they've started releasing tritiated water into the ocean for the next 20-50 years or whatever the fuck the plan is supposed to be.

Nuclear energy fucks around sometimes.

He's back to promote nuclear energy and insult everyone who disagrees!

Fukisima

You still can't safely eat mushrooms in parts of Germany that got contaminated by Chernobyl.

They're all just clones that say the exact same thing I swear

It centralizes control, power and money.

So to make nuclear sound better it's compared against the most polluting source?

I can't say I've seen much push for more coal power plants.

The fact the nobody on any side likes to bring up (and most aren't aware of tbh) is that using large amounts of energy that isn't part of the natural cycle of the planet (i.e. current solar energy), whether that's fossil energy (solar energy the the past), nuclear fission or fusion, it means the population of our species can grow beyond the carrying capacity (and I'm not speaking of simply making enough food, there are many other limits) and puts us into a race condition where we have to figure out how to colonize space before destroying the planet.

Anyone watch the 3 Mile Island documentary on Netflix? Indeed, Holy Shit! That was close, the cleanup was just as bad, and all for profit. The natural gas lobby killed the coal mining industry.

Most people who are against nuclear power, have the following reasons:

• it's the most expensive form of energy due to massive regulations
• the power plants take way too long to build
• nuclear waste is a problem, no one wants to have it buried near their homes
• the fissile material is already rare and difficult to come by, mostly sourced from politically difficult regions, such as fucking Russia

Nuclear power is not a solution.

Also polluted ground water by nuclear waste which we have no way of safely storing and where we just say "let future generations deal with it"

Rather than fission power choose fusion power delivered wirelessly to you house. Our space based fusion reactor can provide you with clean, reliable and inexpensive power today.

Your friends at fusion electric