Tories 'could be reduced to less than 100 seats for first time in 345 years'
Tories 'could be reduced to less than 100 seats for first time in 345 years'
A new Calculus poll suggests that any gains made by the PM after Liz Truss's disastrous spell in charge have been wiped out, with Labour recording a 21 point lead as Tories turn on Rishi Sunak
less than 100 seats
Fewer.
0Uhh... Isn't that what less than means?
0No. In simple terms, you use 'fewer' for things you can count, and 'less' for things you can't. For example, the Tories could win fewer than 100 seats, which would mean they would have less political influence than before.
The key thing is whether you can count it or not. If you remember that simple rule, you will make fewer grammatical mistakes and you will be less wrong.
1
Ok, fine, clearly good news. But PM Sir Starmer . . . just a red Tory.
0Is he really that bad? Genuinely asking, where can Iearn more?
0You'll never get a sensible answer from people who put down comments like this.
Starmer would clearly be better than Sunak, but to say so would be a fundamental issue because their tribalism prevents them from saying anything nice about anyone other than their chosen flavour of Labour.
I mean, he is calling him a Tory. Says everything really, can't be a Socialist unless you agree with me on every point.
0