No. Because Monty may only show another door if the contestant first picked the door with the car. Ie he always tries to lure the contestant away from winning. So in that case it would be bad to switch.
I figured it was more like:
Q: "humanity must answer the charges"
Picard: "the fuck can I do about it?"
Q: "whatever, I don't really care - I was just having some fun"
No, Hamas just murders and kills civilians - it's IS that actually throws gays off roofs.
But why do you continue to support Hamas? Isn't violence bad?
When my wife and I had our first baby, my wife suffered from postpartum depression. A counselor was visiting our home and went through a questionnaire with her. Like statements 'I am able to laugh and enjoy things', and 'I look forward with enjoyment to things' - she had to rate how strongly she agreed with each. She didn't agree with much at the time (luckily only lasted a month or two). My mom was visiting at the time and could apparently overhear this. Afterward my mom commented to me 'even I knew the right answers to those questions'. It hit me then that her generation were just as fucked up but the mentality for them was to just fake it and never admit any problems. The 'correct' answer was always to sound like everything was fine.
If anything can be masculine, then what does it mean to be masculine? I'm all for call yourself whatever you want, be how you want to be; but a certain logical consistency would be nice. If there are no differences between genders, that's great, but then what's the meaning of being trans or not?
There certainly is a lack of talk. The bulk of Trump supporters only get 'news' from a curated rightwing media source. They do not know about the situation in Gaza or the U.S. support for it. They do not know that Trump is threatening Canada's sovereignty. They are not all inherently evil for supporting the right wing, they are ignorant of reality. Communication and education is key. And we can't beat the billionaires unless we find a way to allow truthful communication to actually happen.
So if Hamas unconditionally surrendered and all the hostages were returned, you think Isreal would continue to attack and starve Gaza? They simply couldn't - that would actually lose support from the U.S. if that happened.
BS. Netanyahu may have encouraged Hamas at some point , but they only continue because they want to hurt Israel and they don't care about the starving children in Gaza any more than Israel does. Look on these message boards; many people refuse to put any blame on Hamas. Just me suggesting Hamas should surrender evokes responses only about how Isreal is responsible. It seems that the supporters of Gaza don't want Hamas to surrender - they say they don't like children starving, but seemingly not so much that they'd like Hamas to surrender. It's really strange when you think about it.
Yes that would stop it too. But there's not much likelihood of that. Whereas Hamas is clearly not having any success, and prolonging this war is only causing such terrible misery. And yes that's because the Israelis don't care about the misery of the people of Gaza, they only care about defeating Hamas. There's a lot of evil. But if Hanas fully surrendered, this would stop immediately. And they have nothing to gain by keeping us going.
Nothing to do with 'justice'. Israel's actions here are abhorrent and they are responsible for what they've done as are the Americans for supporting them. But what they are doing it for is to get rid of Hamas because Hamas continues to attack them. If Hamas fully surrendered, this would stop.
Yes they are funded by the same billionaires and will never go against that class. But they are not the same. The latest Republican Party is now so corrupt, anti constitutionalist and working against the people. They are not the same.
Honestly, that amount of introspection is better than the person who just always answers 'fine' but really isn't.