I run ubuntu's server base headless install with a self-curated minimal set of gui packages on top of that (X11, awesome, pulse, thunar) but there's no reason you couldn't install kde with wayland. Building the system yourself gets you really far in the anti-bloatware dept, and the breadth of wiki/google/gpt based around Debian/Ubuntu means you can figure just about any issues out. I do this on a ~$200 eBay random old Dell + a 3050 6gb (slot power only).

For lighter gaming I'll use the Ubuntu PC directly, but for anything heavier I have a win11 PC in the basement that has no other task than to pipe steam over sunshine/moonlight

It is the best of both worlds.

the best way to learn is by doing!

I just built my own automation around their official documentation; it's fantastic.

https://www.wireguard.com/#conceptual-overview

https://www.wireguard.com/install/

https://www.wireguard.com/quickstart/

vyatta and vyatta-based (edgerouter, etc) I would say are good enough for the average consumer. If we're deep enough in the weeds to be arguing the pros and cons of wireguard raw vs talescale; I think we're certainly passed accepting a budget consumer router as acceptably meeting these and other needs.

Also you don't need port forwarding and ddns for internal routing. My phone and laptop both have automation in place for switching wireguard profiles based on network SSID. At home, all traffic is routed locally; outside of my network everything goes through ddns/port forwarding.

If you're really paranoid about it, you could always skip the port-forward route, and set up a wireguard-based mesh yourself using an external vps as a relay. That way you don't have to open anything directly, and internal traffic still routes when you don't have an internet connection at home. It's basically what talescale is, except in this case you control the keys and have better insight into who is using them, and you reverse the authentication paradigm from external to internal.

Talescale proper gives you an external dependency (and a lot of security risk), but the underlying technology (wireguard) does not have the same limitation. You should just deploy wireguard yourself; it's not as scary as it sounds.

What if he wasn't speeding, and didn't dismiss dangerous civil behavior as something he should be allowed to pay 0.0001% of his net worth for and move on without consequence?

We should be one of those countries where civil infraction penalties are calculated based on net worth.

This seems like the closest we'll ever get to "justice" on the guy who only isn't in jail right now for beating the shit out of his pregnant girlfriend "because he's Tyreek Hill"

Fail2ban and containers can be tricky, because under the hood, you'll often have container policies automatically inserting themselves above host policies in iptables. The docker documentation has a good write-up on how to solve it for their implementation

https://docs.docker.com/engine/network/packet-filtering-firewalls/

For your usecase specifically: If you're using VMs only, you could run it within any VM that is exposing traffic, but for containers you'll have to run fail2ban on the host itself. I'm not sure how LXC handles this, but I assume it's probably similar to docker.

The simplest solution would be to just put something between your hypervisor and the Internet physically (a raspberry-pi-based firewall, etc)

Devil's Advocate:

How do we know that our brains don't work the same way?

Why would it matter that we learn differently than a program learns?

Suppose someone has a photographic memory, should it be illegal for them to consume copyrighted works?

It's fuckin' art though

I believe it was a musk move that changed the default sort order from "latest first" to "most engaged" as an intentional inconvenience to encourage users to make accounts and log in.

Oracle, SAP, Redhat, all of their customer portals require it for SSO. I'm not saying it should be that way, but it is.

In a world of good-faith, rational actors, it is reasonable to consult experts in the industry you're about to regulate. In theory, a good-faith adversarial discussion will root out inconsistencies and logical fallacies within the regulation.

Obviously that's usually not the case in modern politics, but I think the system was designed when it was thought that the average person would be operating in good faith, and in that context it makes sense.

I think you go about it the other way: break data analytics and advertising off from everything else. If every unit has to be self-sufficient without reliance on data collection and first-party advertising I think you fix most of the major issues.

I've met a surprising number of "good religious people", but it's not surprising most people think they don't exist. I think this phenomenon transcends religion though

In the case of good Christians, the one unifying quality all of them have is they aren't loud, and they aren't pushy about it. They live their lives with a set of fundamental values and are always willing to go out of their way to help a neighbor. If it weren't for the symbology in their homes you might never know.

I think it's the same with anything else. If you've never met a trans person who doesn't make enforcing pronouns their entire identity, it's easy to have your perspective skewed towards the obnoxious loud ones you see online. If you don't personally know a cop or a black person, sensationalist stereotypes might be your internal idea of normal about them too. Etc...

Linux users though... we're all pushy weirdos. Not a normal good one among us :)

Actually now that it's been mentioned, have you ever tried Linux on the desktop? It's really good these days. I do not use arch btw, I'm a Debian user myself.

Good bot

I think the debate is about what a reasonable class is. I don't think that an appendage, or identity for that matter, is a reasonable proxy for capability class. In my mind you really have to go one of two ways.

You either make everything class-less (think UFC 1) where all weights, sizes, abilities, genetics compete for a singular title

Or

You make science-based classes, based around whatever the best proxy for capabilities are (testosterone, chromosomes, height, weight, body fat percentage, some combination of the former, etc)

If you use nothing as a proxy, there would be a lot of people unable to compete but it would at least be unequivocally "fair". If you use science-based capability classes you would have a wider range of "fair-ish" competitions, but there might be some weird overlap where some men, some women, and those in-between bridge accepted norms.

I'm actually working on a vector DB RAG system for my own documentation. Even in its rudimentary stages, it's been very helpful for finding functions in my own code that I don't remember exactly what project I implemented it in, but have a vague idea what it did.

E.g

Have I ever written a bash function that orders non-symver GitHub branches?

Yes! In your 'webwork automation' project, starting on line 234, you wrote a function that sorts Git branches based on WebWork's versioning conventions.

The color of ones skin does not preclude someone from being bigoted or hateful. It just determines which news network picks up the story.

Overall, we rate LGBTQ Nation Left Biased based on story selection and wording that almost always favors the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to not labeling opinion pieces, which may mislead the reader.

I was with you until I clicked the link but that doesn't seem like an entirely unreasonable take. One can be both "on the right side of history" and "intentionally or incompetently misleading".

yes, the incompetence was a management decision to allow an external vendor to bypass internal canary deployment processes.