Skip Navigation
Jump
Funtastic 😅
  • Yeah with "lockable mode" I mean locking by default instead of requiring every program to specifically call for locking.

    It would probably break lots of software, but only using such mode for the users home (or maybe even specific Downloads/documents/desktop/etc folders within the home directory) could reduce the impact.

    [Edit] wait I think there is whole fs locking mode on mounting, with the "mand" option, going to test it.

    1
  • Jump
    Funtastic 😅
  • I think files being locked is really intuitive, which greatly helps new users. Allowing files to be modified or deleted while they are open makes it really easy to shoot yourself in the foot. For example in the video of Linus switching to Linux he was uncompressing a file and tried to open it while it was still uncompressing, which failed since the file wasn't complete. He didn't understand why the file wasnt uncompressing correctly. That can't happen on Windows, since the file being uncompressed would be locked.

    I think there should be a 'lockable mode', and for distributions oriented to new users the home directory should be mounted like that.

    1
  • Jump
    Funtastic 😅
  • No, silverblue does all the work before you restart the computer, and the actual work doesn't involve replacing the OS itself but basically downloading some files and just checking a different git branch when booting.

    4
  • Jump
    Funtastic 😅
  • This is a byproduct of one of the largest and more ignored differences between windows and linux. The fact that Linux let's you modify files while they are open whereas windows doesn't.

    This means that you can update a linux system by just replacing the files with the new ones while it runs. On the other side, Windows can't modify its own files while it runs, so instead it has a second entire OS to update itself, and requires a reboot to unload all the files and boot from the updater without locking windows files.

    76
  • Jump
    Pressure grows on Apple to open up iMessage
  • Is RCS encrypted? I still prefer signal above everything else. Whatsapp seems to be passable privacy wise, but it's Facebook so I don't trust it one bit.

    One way or another, Whatsapp is the standard around the world and it for sure beats SMS.

    3
  • Jump
    History lives in the present
  • I cant believe it, someone who actually knows what they are speaking about?? in my imitation Reddit forum????

    Let's not forget that Britain also ensured the rights of Palestinians in that same declaration, I would like to see them act on that one.

    9
  • Jump
    Do you trust Proton?
  • One of the bold claims of proton is that all your data is encrypted and they can't see it (not 100% sure how they do it, probably your key is encrypted with your password as a symmetric key? Then when you log in, the client unlocks your private key and then that key unlocks the emails and stuff).

    Now, it also turns out that they write the software that uses your key to decrypt the emails. It would be trivial for them to just send the keys back to themselves and decrypt all your stuff.

    I don't think this is a huge point against proton, as AFAIK no one else even offers encrypted email. But nonetheless I would like to see an api and some third party clients.

    5
  • Jump
    Great experience with Wayland on Nvidia with GNOME 44
  • I love Fedora! but sadly I have been burned twice by Red Hat already. I refuse to be burned a third time so I'm moving my servers over to Debian. I like to use the same ecosystem on all my computers, so I also moved my desktop and laptop over to Debian.

    I tried OpenSUSE a few times, but I disliked YaST, disliked the unclear future of Leap and disliked the unclear future of ALP. I thought I would love Aeon (I used Silverblue when I used Fedora) but I didn't like being unable to compare my system against a "base" one. So for the time, at least until the situation over SUSE clears up, I'm going to stick with Debian.

    Anyways, once GNOME 45 hits Debian Testing I think I'm going to move over to that, I would prefer to use Stable (which I use on my laptop and job) but I really want a recent GNOME for my Nvidia GPU. I have a bunch of BTRFS snapshots ready to go back to stable at any moment if anything happens, so I'm not too worried.

    5
  • Jump
    Great experience with Wayland on Nvidia with GNOME 44
  • Is that on X11 or Wayland?

    When my main PC had Nvidia I was desperate to move from Xorg to Wayland because Xorg was laggy like that video you showed while Wayland behaved perfectly.

    I think that only happens on Xorg if you have different monitors though.

    1
  • Jump
    UBI works too
  • UBI is a way to make capitalism more fair. One important fact about capitalism that seemingly everyone forgot is that competition is a requirement for it to work.

    If there is fierce competition in all markets, even if everyone is getting UBI, price hikes are impossible.

    17
  • Jump
    Great experience with Wayland on Nvidia with GNOME 44
  • I went for an AMD APU on my laptop explicitly because I wanted to avoid hybrid graphics. While I would like a faster igp, for battery life and ease of use, APUs are fantastic.

    2
  • I mostly use AMD and have been using Wayland since GNOME 40 without any problems, loving the consistently perfect frames and fantastic scaling (with Wayland programs, but nowadays I use nearly no X11-only programs).

    I tried Nvidia with Wayland a few times and it always was a clusterfuck. I remember when Nvidia just released GBM support on their drivers I actually compiled my own Mutter to try Wayland because there was a bug with the hardware cursor that overflowed the GPU memory. I even tried eglstreams a few times with the Nvidia-developed GNOME backend. No matter what, I always had problems with invisible programs, programs leaving trails like the cards falling in Windows 98 Solitaire when moving the window, slow programs, blurry programs, unresponsive programs, etc.

    Today I tried again Nvidia with GNOME 43/Wayland on Debian 12 and also experienced lots of the same issues as I always had. I then moved to Sid with GNOME 44 and was pleasantly surprised to see nearly all my issues just go away. Have not seen any invisible programs, nor any trails behind windows when moved. I have seen abnormally slow programs though, the GNOME terminal seems to struggle when scrolling fullscreen, whereas my laptop with and AMD APU works perfectly.

    Currently happily using GNOME 44 with Wayland on Nvidia, never thought I would get to say this. I'm hyped for GNOME 45 to drop in Sid!

    21