Not sure what tv you have- smart tvs today sometimes can run steam link natively.
Yeah? And the last Russian to die is going to be in a recommissioned t55.
Bach didn't have planes trains and automobiles...
Read your comment again. You are outraged because someone made a completely valid assumption bases on the information you gave. Truley someone that old wouldn't be that angry about it would they? You are really just reaffirming that you are a kid masquerading as someone older by being this upset.
The point of my comment wasn't even about your age. It was that this is how things go in general.
You are really gonna feel bad when the price for such a game was 39.99. This is just the way it works friend. When you get older some kid is going to be saying the same thing but 79.99 will be the pricepoint.
Your life isn't going to be "normal" and it's not your fault. You are going to be different and it's not because you are better or worse. just different. Just do your best and that's all anyone can want from you.
Oh man- here I am having paid off every debt I've had early and never being punished for it. Guess your response of 1989 just really showed me.
What makes you think owning property means you don't know economics? I'm willing to bet those people also have a lot invested in stocks/bonds/business... feels like your just mad because they have an a you have not.
I feel like that more a reason you specificity aren't rich and the rest of the people have very different reasons.
What? Since when?
Sure- but it's not something for you to be able to look at just because you want to. If I don't want you to know something about me you don't have the right to know.
Whoopsie. Maybe take another look at how portals are handled in the game. Then extrapolate that to this "conundrum "
The answer is neither. They wouldn't be ejected at all theyd just fall right back into the portal. Which would make them fall back through the orange back and forth forever. Until someone grabs the blue portal wall and pulls them out.
You now understand and agree with the previous post as well this one. Fact.
great. so how are you planning on making that happen? by taking my property and giving it to someone? i mean i literally built my first house. so i can't keep it just because i'm not living in it? it should remain empty? what exactly is your plan man? Maybe YOU should not join a death squad?
See there's a few actually relevant points there.
i brought up military as a single way to change your lot in life. there are plenty of others, i even mentioned as much in the original post. Is it perfect? Nope- is it a viable avenue? yep. Is it morally right- meh. Your views rely on the thought that what is morally right is how things should go- at the same time you try to say your ideology isn't based on morals but materialistic and critical evaluation of how things actually are.... while completely disregarding the reality of how things actually are and instead focus on what is morally the correct way to approach things... it's mindboggling to see the dissonance.
You are right that I disagree with the ideal and tenants of communism/marxism at a base level- those are great ideas that never can be realized as people aren't going to abide by the concepts in reality. Someone will always attempt to manipulate the system through avarice, laziness, whatever. So working for the appropriate value won't ever actually work. On top of that - people are going to always disagree on what a particular unit of work is valued at. There is no way to make a unit of work equal a particular value- doing so results in experts in their craft being paid the same as novices in their craft. This also results in no one being able to own anything unless you built it yourself from the materials you produced yourself.
Going your route will simply result in mediocrity everywhere and everyone not getting enough of what they need. You ultimately wind up right back in the same situation with some slob running things and taking more than his fair share and simply writing a tenet or law up to cover his butt.
as to the last half of your comment. what you said is absolutely saying everyone has to go kill civilians for their free education. Did you mean to say that? maybe not- but it's what you said. So to that i'll just say you should probably say what you mean rather than relying on the insane rhetoric that it actually is. We don't all live in lemmygrad/hexbear/comradeship and we don't know the inner talking points you guys have spun up. Nor do we want to. Because traditionally you aren't in here for real discussion but for the lulz and memes and to own the west/imperials/bourgeoise
of course- because my books are the only books and any other books are imperialist, bourgeois, evil landlord scum that needs to die. i'm glad you've accepted my viewpoint.