Just saw some of your comments and really like how you’re using the spoiler tag. Will try to emulate it going forward. […]
FYI, I've heard a couple reports [1.1][1.2] that the spoiler tag isn't rendered properly on some front ends currently. Despite that, I haven't altered my usage of it, as I don't have any viable alternative at the moment.
I’m not sure what else I can say about it. Bluesky is a shareholder-owned company started by Jack Dorsey, one of Twitter’s co-founders.
To be fair, Bluesky is specifically registered as a public benefit corporation [1]. Whether that will mean anything positive in the end, I guess, is to be determined.
Oh, yeah — I wasn't inferring that any one of those is the appropriate tag for this purpose; I was just mentioning that there are methods for tagging alternate names depending on the context, and that, perhaps, something similar could be done for this purpose (which, imo, it seems is main topic of discussion in the linked forum post).
Yeah, potentially. I honestly just haven't taken a moment to research an appropriate product, yet. So, if you have any recommendations, I would appreciate them 😊
Personally, I don't use shampoo. I find that scrubbing my head and hair using my hands while in the shower is more than sufficient to clean it. Personally, though, I do still want some hair product just for its perfume, though I haven't found a satisfactory product yet.
Thank you so much for putting in effort to try and cite your claims and for providing a references section! This is a practice that I think should be much more common. PM me if you're interested in the citation style that I use.
Just that there’s nothing keeping Bluesky from enshittifying the same way Twitter (and all the other centrally-corporate-owned social media platforms) have.
Imo, this is just an argument of definitions. For example, Merriam-Webster's definition doesn't require one to be paid in order for them to be called a journalist [1[2]]. Whether a one must be paid in order to call themself a chef, however, seems to depend on the definition of "proffesional" [3] and perhaps "profession" [4], neither of which explicitly require one to be paid [4][5].
[…] a problem that either doesn’t exist or doesn’t make up the bulk of the issue you’re trying to fix […]
Would you mind going into more depth about "the bulk of the issue you're trying to fix"? I would love to hear a counter opinion on what the true issue(s) may be.
Kalcifer @ Kalcifer @sh.itjust.works 帖子 161评论 1,710加入于 2 yr. ago
FYI, I've heard a couple reports [1.1][1.2] that the spoiler tag isn't rendered properly on some front ends currently. Despite that, I haven't altered my usage of it, as I don't have any viable alternative at the moment.