Kalcifer @ Kalcifer @sh.itjust.works

All of this user's content is licensed under [CC BY 4.0](https://creativeco

---

Read more

Posts

161

Comments

1,710

Joined

2 yr. ago

What does your instance (I'm presuming redlemmy.com) offer that sets it apart from the rest?

Damn shame Linux is so unfriendly to anti cheats.

What about Linux do you think is "unfriendly to anti cheats"?

average annual income means if you are poorer, you get punished more for stealing the same object. Not sure that’s a good idea

I'm inclined to agree.

Thank you for the clarification 😊.

Is that an "agree" as in you hadn't considered what I said, or that you agree to that in addition? If it was the latter, I should clarify that I wasn't adding supplementary information — I was outlining what I thought was a flaw in your rationale (eg argument from ignorance) for distrust in Signal.

Instead of fishing for a debate […]

I will not engage in any debate without first knowing how the term is being defined.

Thank you for noticing 😊 ­— I have hope that it's a practice that will catch on eventually. I do my best to not engage in conjecture: If I make any claim, I try to make sure that I cite it. The same sort of thing goes for anything derived from logic — ie I do my best to describe my thought processes to make sure that I reduce the possibility of incorrect assumptions being made on anything that I post. It's a little bit tedious at times, but I think it's important.

Is that true? I just checked the reviews for all of the McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania on Google Maps ^[4] and none of them appear to have been review bombed recently or have any mention of the UHI shooter ^[1][2][3].

For anyone's reference, here is the study: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/12/04/voters-broadly-positive-about-how-elections-were-conducted-in-sharp-contrast-to-2020/ ^[1]

The album "Loveseat" by Still Woozy.

All I could find on this is something called "genetic sexual attraction" ^[1], though Wikipedia contains arguments that it's pseudoscience ^[1.1]. Here's a Reddit post asking about this. ^[3].

Related to this, I also came across the "Westermarck effect" ^[2] which appears to suggest that people who grow up together are less likely to be romantically attracted to each other ^[2.1].

That's fair!

Oh, I totally follow the logic of why each group would want a report, but I would still like to have an official source for the functionality besides anecdotes, if possible.

But I’d also view a singular commercial company’s no-cost product as not being a long term bet on privacy/anonymity.

Oh I completely agree with the idea that a federated service, like Matrix ^[1], is far preferable to a centralized one, eg Discord ^[2]; I have no issue with using Matrix (I personally use it extensively) I just think one should be careful with the idea of using it with the intent of being anonymous.

But, to me, that doesn't really explain why it would make sense to teach things that wouldn't be useful.

Would you be able to point to a location in the code?

Who's the author?

While this is peripherally interesting to hear, without Linux support ^[1][2], I am not personally interested.

Because I believe in the idea of the Fediverse and I want it to succeed.

Noted! Thanks! For my own future reference, would you be able to cite official documentation for where that information is located?