Hmm. I at least don't think that it's fasciculare. The stipe should have a collar [1.1] (though, I question this as none of the images I see seem to shop a collar), which this doesn't. The caps should be convex [1.1], which they aren't — the babies are somewhat, but the mature one's are wavy. From the picture's that I've seen, the color is also off — they're shown as more yellow [1.2][2], where this one is not yellow — the color of the specimens that I've observed is, in general, very different.
Hm, but I'm not sure people would attribute that to the design of the underlying OS itself rather than just the employer. Like do those people with restrictions on Windows blame Microsoft? It'd be the same as someone blaming the Linux maintainers for employer placed restrictions on an OS running Linux. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure someone would still do that, but I'm not convinced that the majority would think that way — I think most people would be able to make the distinction.
I still expect it to be done in the open, one of the things Munich got right was upstreaming all their changes, which meant that even when it was cancelled, nothing was lost. Maintaining out of tree changes is just way to much work
Would you be able to cite a source for this Munich program? I'd like to read more about it.
Yeah, I was doing some more reading and I think it might only be the newest version of the UnifiedPush spec which requires the message to be encrypted.
The question I would then have is: Who would be responsible for updating their system to support this (ie the Unified Push encryption)? Say if we, for example, look at Matrix. Would Matrix need to modify their notification API? Would the Matrix gateway in Ntfy need to be modified? Would some other component of Ntfy be modified? Would the distributor app need to be modified? Would the end-user application need to be modified?
Edit: on the GPL front, GPL doesn’t require that you publish your code to everyone, just to the recipients of your binaries. And you only have to give it upon request. So they definitely could keep it somewhat under wraps if they wanted to.
When I said "hidden from the public", I was meaning refusing to disclose the source code even when asked. I do wonder how the laws would apply to government organizations violating copyright 🤔. Like what if it was the OS for some defense system? I'm not sure a government would be too keen on disclosing that — even if it was requested though some sort of freedom of information request (if the respective country has that) — and would rather classify it and refuse to disclose regardless of the license. I'm not aware of any precedent of this.
Yeah, I have my default sort set to "Subscribed" + "Scaled" (I want to primarily see the stuff that I follow, and I don't want the small communities to be drowned out by the large ones). When I want to see what's trending (big topics that are being talked about a lot) right now, I'll switch to "All" + "Active". It seems like "Hot" favors boosting trending groups rather than trending single posts.
Thank you for the source! One critique that I have of it is that, while it does state that trans people are 4 times more likely than cis people to be victims of violent crime [1], it doesn't appear to answer the question of rates of perpetrating violent crime between trans and cis people — well, aside from conjecture [2][3].
a really locked down/limited system might not be a step forward at all
Depends what you mean. Locked down as in hidden from the public (I don't think that's legal anyways because of the GPL) would be bad. But locked down/limited from employees so that they can't bork the system is good, imo.
I never heard of one shooting up a school church or whatever.
First off, one must be very careful of generalizing to an entire group from the actions of a small sample [1]. Using the metric of whether there have been trans people who have engaged in mass shootings is quite reductionist, and is a faulty generalization — if I am to interpret what you said to mean that "conservatives" are "against" all trans people because they think that they are all responsible for "shooting up" schools and churches. Second, to address your belief, to my knowledge, there has been at least one instance of a school shooter being trans [2].
Why does it seem most people, mainly conservatives, against Trans people?
I think it's important to establish the validity of the claim, and the assumptions being made, since you cited no sources, nor did you provide any definitions, nor did you specify any assumptions; I will presume that by "conservative", you are referring to American Republicans.
Why does it seem most people [...][are] against Trans people?
It does not appear that "most people" (I assume you mean "the majority of people") are "against trans people" (I'm not entirely sure exactly what you mean by this, so I will assume it means not being in favor of protecting trans people from discrimination) [1.2][1.1].
Why does it seem [...] conservatives [...][are] against Trans people?
It does seem that the majority of Republicans are against trans protections [1.1].
ADDENDUM (2024-11-23T06:49Z): Could someone who's downvoting this please tell me why they are doing so? I'm rather confused about what the rationale could be. I didn't even state any opinions; I was only fact checking. Was I perhaps too abrasive sounding? I wasn't intending to be rude.
Imo, this is your answer. I'm not sure exactly what other solution you want. Content will not appear on Lemmy without someone first posting it. Advertising the platform to help draw people in is also important.
Perhaps it's a difference in communication experience, and effectiveness? Maybe the person who is already famous has lots of experience with talking to people and conveying information — perhaps they make more efficient use of a small amount of information — whereas the person with a lot of experience on the subject matter, but is poor at communication, is unable to effectively communicate the subject matter. One must be able to retain people's attention to effectively communicate; this takes skill.
Ah, yeah that seems to be it. I switched to all+hot and I'm now seeing a lot of cats. I wonder what other content I'm missing out on by sorting by "active"? When I sort by "all", I'm trying to get the posts that are trending the most on Lemmy. Maybe active isn't the best way to do this? Interestingly, the posts that I see when I sort by "hot" don't have as many upvotes as those when I sort by "active" so idk.
I enabled logging in the Ntfy app, and, upon receiving a message in Element X, it showed the Matrix notification push message in plain text in the logs. If Ntfy indeed doesn't know anything about Unified Push and is just the medium through which a Unified Push message travels, then I would think that it wouldn't be the service decrypting the message, yet it is decrypted in the logs.
Kalcifer @ Kalcifer @sh.itjust.works 帖子 161评论 1,710加入于 2 yr. ago
Hmm. I at least don't think that it's fasciculare. The stipe should have a collar [1.1] (though, I question this as none of the images I see seem to shop a collar), which this doesn't. The caps should be convex [1.1], which they aren't — the babies are somewhat, but the mature one's are wavy. From the picture's that I've seen, the color is also off — they're shown as more yellow [1.2][2], where this one is not yellow — the color of the specimens that I've observed is, in general, very different.
::: spoiler References