One case would be cheating; one case wouldn't (assuming that you mean that one player is aware of the missed check).

you should (or should at least consider) add in “castling en passant”, where a piece landing on the space a king left on the turn after it castles, or on the space the king passed through in the act of castling, also counts as capturing the king.

Good point.

Interesting point!

The app that wants to provide the notifications would then be said to use UnifiedPush, right?

I will preface by saying that I am not casting doubt on your claim, I'm simply curious: What is the rationale behind why it would be so unlikely for such an exploit to occur? What rationale causes you to be so confident?

Is there any other bit of information that I could provide that would aid in their definitive identification?

I sometimes find the colors on pictures a bit misleading, because most people take them with their phone, which like to manipulate the picture (weird color corrections, sharpening, AI, etc.) and are too dark.

Optimally, take them somewhere under a light with normed values (e.g. some LEDs or fluorescent lights give off "office light" or "daylight"), where the white balance can easily be adjusted.

Or, you can add some objects with known colours for reference, e.g. something like those take-things moviemakers use, certain LEGO bricks, and so on.

Good idea about lighting/white balance. I will try to improve the color accuracy in future images. I could potentially just capture the image RAW for future adjustments to color.

1x glass (microscopy slide, mirror, etc.)

I've done this before, and it worked well, but I was unable to locate any when I was trying to ID this. Perhaps I should just purchase a bulk amount of cheap glass slides for this purpose to store prints on?

1x black paper (if whiteish)

I tried accomplish this end by simply coloring a spot on the paper black for contrast (as seen in the image in the post). It certainly isn't perfect, but I think it served its purpose. That being said, purchasing some black paper for this purpose is likely a much better idea.

Maybe you could optimise the spore print picture.

I personally like to take the prints on aluminium foil, because

1. It gives okay contrast for both bright and dark spores.
2. It's cheap
3. It's almost sterile and can easily be disinfected
4. You can store the prints better by folding the foil.
5. You can ship and share the prints way easier without risks (microscopy slides breaking, paper soaking up, etc.)

Neat Idea to use aluminum foil! I'll have to try aluminum foil next time. I also hadn't considered physically storing the prints for future reference ­— it likely would make sense to do so.

I believe 99% of people out here, myself included, probably couldn’t discern the spores microscopically anyway, so that being missing won’t matter much or at all.

I figured that it'd be worth it to include it, at least for documentation purposes, if not for the potentially unlikely case that it does aid identification in some meaningful way.

I gathered another sample of the mushroom, and, from what I can tell, the cuticle is not peelable/it has no pellicle.

Are there softwares to simulate enough electronics and microcontrollers to learn?

It depends on what you are looking for. For a quick simulation to get a very rough, and more ideal, visual, you can use something like Falstad. But for anything more practical and useful, I'd recommend using SPICE. There's lot's of software out there that implements SPICE [2]. KiCAD offers SPICE simulation [1].

I want to try learning microcontrollers afterwards but I can’t afford to buy any IRL atm

The perceived expensiveness of things is certainly relative, but I would still argue that the hardware for microcontrollers really doesn't have to be that expensive [1][2][3][4].

::: spoiler References

1. "Pocket AVR Programmer". Sparkfun. Accessed: 2024-11-21T02:36Z. https://www.sparkfun.com/products/9825.
2. "Raspberry Pi Pico". CanaKit. Accessed: 2024-11-21T02:37Z. https://www.canakit.com/raspberry-pi-pico.html?cid=cad&src=raspberrypi.
3. "ATMEGA328P-PU-ND". DigiKey. Accessed: 2024-11-21T02:37Z. https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/microchip-technology/ATMEGA328P-PU/1914589.
4. "Arduino Uno Rev3". Arduino Store. Arduino CC. Accessed: 2024-11-21T02:40Z. https://store-usa.arduino.cc/products/arduino-uno-rev3. :::

Looks like a Fractal Node 304?

Yep! I've found that the case is possibly a little too cramped for my liking — I'm not overly fond of the placement of the drive bay hangars — but overall it's been alright. It's definitely a nice form factor.

It wasn't a deliberate choice. It was simply hardware that I already had available at the time. I have had no performance issues of note as a result of the hardware's age, so I've seen no reason to upgrade it just yet.

If the cap cuticle is peelable you could make a case that it’s not Hypholoma but without any blueing it’s gonna be Deconica not Psilocybe.

For clarity, are you saying that all species in the genus deconica have a peelable cap cuticle?

I’m sorry to disappoint you, but even though they look similar to P. cyanescens, they aren’t.

Would you by chance have a guess as to what they actually might be?

Very great report! We need more of those similar to that!

Thank you 😊 I tried to provide as much useful information as possible (that I could think of, anyways) to aid in identification. I would've also provided an image of the spores, but I don't currently have access to a microscope of sufficient magnification to image them.

Do you have any recommendations, for future reference, for other bits of information not mentioned that would aid in identification?

For clarity, do you mean psilocybe cyanescens?

Main Server

Services

• Jellyfin
• FreshRSS
• Borg
• Immich
• Nextcloud AIO
• RSS-Bridge

Hardware

• CPU: Intel Core i5-4460
• GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 760
• Memory: Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G (8GB DDR3-1600)
• Motherboard: ASUS H81I-PLUS

OS

• Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS

Reverse Proxy

Services

• Caddy

Hardware

• Rasbperry Pi 4 Model B Rev 1.5 (2GB)

OS

• Debian 12

Router

Hardware

• TP-Link Archer C7 AC1750

OS

• OpenWRT 23.05.5