This type of censorship never stops. There's no doubt in my mind as this trend continues we're going to see other taboo communities like piracy, not mainstream accepted politics, etc. ones being banned and their servers defederated.
We've already seen admins of this server removing comments and banning people for posting stuff they don't agree with. I don't see how Lemmy can succeed when we're not even at like 2.5k users per day on the biggest server and the admins here are already going extreme on the censorship.
Still got nothing. You only have fear. You sound like those parents in the 1980's screaming about the devil when a kid dared to listen to Twisted Sister.
"Immigrants should be forced guided into places that us superior white people, who are above what I deem menial work, are needed born-in-country people struggle to live in."
Adding onto the other poster's comment, another reason is because the US will never pour unlimited money and resources into these people making sure they do.
Europe didn't pull itself up by its own bootstraps after WWII.
How am I being propagandized by TikTok?
Why does China having every single last drop of my information (they don't even, barely a sliver) matter?
You need to back up what you say. Your Western brainwashed idea of common sense and obvious xenophobia/racism ain't an objective truth in the world.
Guess where most people live and want to live?
Can you explain how? All I see are lesbians and black people.
And why does China spying on me matter? It's better than the West, no?
"We're just looking out for the best interest of our children!"
A bunch of 35-45 year old Lemmy users bashing something they don't use but something the kids do. Just like their boomer and silent gen parents.
You guys fucking suck. I'd say I hope you all have sad, pathetic lives, but I know you all already do.
Nearly every city on the planet with a subway system disputes your bullshit.
It's so funny how you guys operate. Even when confronted, you just cherry-pick what's being said and strip away the context to push the exact same anti-science and anti-truth positions that were just given retorts. I don't know if it's ignorance or wilful deceit, but either way, people like you are a net negative to humanity.
If you knew anything, you'd know this isn't the reason why getting vaccine approval takes so long. It takes so long because there's a mountain of bureaucrats, lawyers, researchers, and money required to get stuff moving along. Vaccines are pretty low the totem pole for companies and the government to give a shit about, since they're usually about prevention and not treatment. Companies and the government can't throw everything at a vaccine to approve. The only reason the covid vaccine was streamlined was because, you guessed it, we were and are in a global pandemic. Nothing about the approval of vaccines was abnormal, it still took nearly 2.5 years.
Whenever someone just straight up lies about vaccines and the responses to vaccines, they always need to bring up how they're all vaccinated and pro-vaccine.
There are mandated back doors in most message apps.
Source?
Hamas's victims blood is on the hands of Israel. Hamas didn't pop up from nowhere. This is all on Israel.
I don't see this happening. Apple to/from Android are the only texts that the government can easily snoop on.
Link me. You're all saying they exist. I'm seeing nothing.
Antinatalists constantly tell people to kill their offspring.
Some do, sure, but that's what what antinatalism is. This is like saying "vegans constantly tell meat eaters to kill themselves." Yes, some do, but the point of veganism isn't the death of meat eaters.
I argue on the same level as antinatalists.
No, you argue on your deranged level by justifying it with your antinatalist boogey man. You're like those YouTube conservatives who put up a picture of a blue haired teenager on screen and saying "this is who the liberals are."
If the cause is to end the suffering that humankind causes then there is only one solution.
This is like saying the way to end violence done in the name of religion is to kill off all religious people. There's more that goes into getting to an end solution than just immediately jumping to it. And it also seems like you think antinatalists entire existence is about making antinatalism, like there's nothing else besides this.
If my notions of the world are wrong, and humankind really is only a burden, then youre indirectly also calling for genocide.
You seem to not know what the word "natalism" means. It's about bring people into the world. It has nothing to do with people who are already living.
And killing off all living people isn't a genocide. It's "speciocide." Completely different things. Comparing antinatalists with people who commit genocides is unbelievably unhinged, but I should have seen it coming from someone like you.
You think that isn’t fucked up?
The only thing I think is fucked up in this discussion is people who only believe in antinatalism-lite for eugenic reasons and, of course, you.
So if you were truly commited to your cause and you wanted your bloodline to die with you, then you could also [i do not condone selfharm, this is purely for argumentation].
I don't have a cause. You're putting words into my mouth because you don't know how to argue in good faith.
You're literally telling me to kill myself because you're personally offended someone dare challenge your preconceived notions of the world. You're a truly fucked up individual. I pray you don't have or ever have any dependents. You're a danger to society.
I think you might be glamorizing it a bit. Talking about politics was until "recently" considered very rude and taboo. There's been a big culture shift in talking about politics in the past maybe 15-20 years or so. I don't have any hard data and this is just my view, but I think a major turning point was when a lot of the country realized how fucked up the wars in the Middle East were. This put people squarely into two pretty emotional camps, pro-war and anti-war. Everyone* had an opinion. Everyone* was open about sharing that opinion. Over those few years 2003-2008 was probably the biggest shift in openly talking about politics among regular people. And since being open about politics was now in, here came the wave of loud and proud racism from "centrists" and conservatives once Obama was elected and it hasn't died down since.
So, yeah, it's real easy for discussions to get "hot" when one side is openly calling for all the -isms in the book and people on the other side finally realizing what's happening.
I said parents are selfish for having kids. You can try to downplay it all you want, but you don't have a kid for this future magical mystical kid. You have a kid for your own wants and needs over everything else. Just because having kids is an accepted action in society doesn't make it not selfish. And since you think of "selfishness" as a bad thing, this makes your brain scramble and your cognitive dissonance go into overdrive causing you to come up with completely inept retorts like I'm "selfish" for simply existing and using resources that the Earth clearly has as I'm using them.
Gov. Maura Healey signed a $1 billion-a-year tax relief bill Wednesday that top Democrats on Beacon Hill have heralded as a way to make Massachusetts more competitive and help residents deal with s…
> Negotiators reached a deal two weeks ago that cuts the short-term capital gains tax from 12% to 8.5%, a business-backed move that has riled progressives who argue it gives a break to the wealthy. The compromise will cost the state $561 million in fiscal year 2023 and $1 billion a year starting in fiscal year 2027.
> The bill also excludes estates valued up to $2 million from the estate tax by allowing for a uniform credit of $99,600.
Sure, there is a cute $50 and $120 increase in rent and dependent child tax credit and some minor benefits for low-income and disabled people (that will often go unused), but the point of this bill is entirely about appeasing to the very rich of this state.
This is a disturbing anti-poor and anti-middle class law fervently pushed by the governor and compromised with the legislature, who thankfully made the bill slightly less anti-poor and anti-middle class than the governor wanted. But still, another dark day for Massachusetts perpetuated by our conservative governor and state legislature.
The Bank of Japan stuck to its ultra-loose monetary policy Friday, though officials face increasing pressure to turn more hawkish as the yen weakens and after fresh data showed inflation remained stubbornly high. While most other major central banks have pressed ahead with a campaign of interest rat...
Arroyo and Lara, two of the most influential and outspoken progressive voices on the City Council, became the first incumbent councilors in at least four decades to be eliminated in the first round of voting.
Taking away a lane for cars to create a dedicated bus lane made for faster commutes for everyone, thanks to faster, more reliable service on one of the region's busiest bus routes.
Taking away a lane for cars to create a dedicated bus lane made for faster commutes for everyone, thanks to faster, more reliable service on one of the region's busiest bus routes.
Campbell's office approved 34 potential ballot questions, including measures that would remove the MCAS exam requirement, gradually increase the minimum wage for tipped workers to the same as the general minimum wage, and decriminalize psychedelic substances such as psilocybin mushrooms.
The road to the November 2024 ballot continues for the most closely-watched initiative petitions, dealing with the role of the MCAS test as a graduation requirement, the rights and benefits for drivers on app-based platforms, rent control, voter identification and the auditor's ability to audit the state Legislature.
Attorney General Andrea Campbell's office Wednesday said that it had certified almost all of the 42 potential ballot questions that had been filed by the August deadline. 34 proposals, in some cases representing multiple proposed versions of a potential question, were certified. Seven were not certified and one was withdrawn by its sponsor, according to Campbell's office.
Cleared to continue moving towards next year's ballot was a question filed by Rep. Mike Connolly that would grant cities and towns a range of new "tenant protection" options, including the ability to impose rent control, which voters banned statewide via a 1994 ballot question.
Two potential questions that would remove the MCAS exam as a high school graduation requirement were also given the green light Wednesday, as were measures that would gradually increase the minimum wage for tipped workers to the same as the general minimum wage, decriminalize psychedelic substances such as psilocybin mushrooms, and halt the state's gas tax when gasoline prices are above a certain threshold.
Campbell's office also approved multiple versions of a revived app-based driver question and a proposed law requiring voter identification. Petitioners often file multiple versions of a question for review in hopes of getting at least one certified by the attorney general's office.
Campbell's office also certified a proposed question that would establish a state law explicitly permitting the auditor's office to audit the Legislature.
DiZoglio has been pushing for months to audit the House and Senate, both of which she was once a member of. Top Democrats have resisted, arguing she does not have the authority and that doing so would violate the "separation of powers" required by the Constitution. In late July, DiZoglio appealed to Campbell for the attorney general's support in a move toward litigation.
The attorney general's office did not certify questions that would limit political spending by "foreign-influenced businesses," establish a "Non-Partisan Top Five Election System," change voter registration laws, and affirm a "Constitutional Birthright to be a Person."
The decisions are based on whether the questions comply with a set of requirements in the state constitution governing initiative petitions.
Questions have to be "in proper form for submission to the people," can only contain subjects that are "related" or "mutually dependent," and cannot feature a proposal "substantially the same" as anything that went before voters in either of the two most recent biennial statewide elections. They also can't touch certain topics, like religion, judges, specific state appropriations and portions of the state's Declaration of Rights.
The campaigns that got the green light Wednesday will need to collect 74,574 signatures and file them with local officials by Nov. 22, and then with the secretary of state's office by Dec. 6.
Ballot questions with enough certified signatures will head to the Legislature in January 2024, where lawmakers can approve them, propose a substitute or decline to take action. If lawmakers opt against action by May 1, 2024, campaigns must collect another 12,429 signatures and file them with local officials by June 19, 2024, then the secretary of state's office by July 3, 2024.
Is there a way to open links in new windows? I can't find anything in the settings and it's kind of annoying. Thanks