Some poem in Hebrew about a failed relationship.

Are the 50's making a comeback over there? should i expect Elvis impersonators returning to the mainstream or something?

Hypothetically speaking, what in your opinion would be the odds nowadays for those who oppose the draft and those who comply with the pro-war narrative?

How much would such a situation escalate domestically?

What did you switch to?

Transitive hierarchical structure

What do you mean by "transitive"?

Note that one of the merits behind an effective modern army is its ability to maintain regular troops that are trained, equipped, drilled and rotated with a reserve on a regular basis - something that's usually achieved with a centralized form of organization and is backed by resources that in the current day are provided by a state. What's the plan on providing modern weaponry, persistent intelligence, as well as infrastructures for logistic, communication, ordinance etc' for a militia that's "transitive" by nature? who's going to keep an eye on those resources and make sure they don't breed power tripping warlords, terrorists or even simple crime organizations? what's the plan on keeping track of munitions and deadly weapons after the militia is disbanded?

Employ decentralized resistance / guerilla warfare. This can be extremely effective.

Highly effective to a degree and can still be bleed-out, toppled or at the very least kept under control with a more organized army. Also decentralization can easily turn to feudalism with armed groups if they start going against each other for whatever reason, such as in the case of political subversion exploiting inherit weaknesses in a non-centralized structure (divide and conquer, etc').

If allies and neighbors are watching, engage in nonviolent resistance. This is difficult and requires getting the message out to other groups and the attacker’s constituency to pressure them.

What's a nonviolent resistance going to do to a threat actor who's eventual plan is political subversion and/or an incursion? why would they give a s*it as long as the war-effort on their side goes uninterrupted by the target or their allies until they decide to escalate?

Putting aside that dying as a rachist katsap isn't ever a good scenario and the controversial ethics behind assisted suicide, i think getting your head crushed by a buff lady probably wouldn't feel any different from having it slowly smashed in a vice after a few seconds of cranking.

Also what's really attractive here is the lady, not the dying part. You can't experience the close company of her tights when you're dead.

At this rate there will only be one place to escape to that hasn't been corrupted by capitalism - SPACE.

People die when they are killed.

Although the prospect of a buff Ukrainian bishojo doing it may seem attractive, the dying part is still there.

Have you ever seen one of those videos where buff ladies crush a watermelon with their bare tights?

I think this might actually be a fatality move you're looking at here.

Looks awfully similar to this photo of Kaylyn Slevin, which i also happened to find on the first page when searching for OP's title.