Don't know. I hope this is a random person and they don't have his face.
Ah. Well, I suppose that's a good point, though I think everyone here has already seen the photos.
True. I'm not taking any takes here to be definitely true. I was just interested in other people's perspectives until we get a proper response. :)
He didn't really know for sure, either, I don't think. That's why it's weird to me that he just 'surrendered'. Was what happened completely legal this way? Can he not go to prison?
Ah, I see. I thought there was a community of infamous South Korean conservatives or something.
edit: typo
Sorry, not that well-versed in the ecosystem here yet. What could my username have meant?
I don't support him, if that's what you're asking. I'm just curious about sociology and politics. :)
Couldn't that have been just because of the immediate confusion and indecision about escalating by the lower unit commanders?
There could have been infighting in the military, but he surely would have had quite some support, no? Why not take the chance if he already commited to imposing martial law?
Edit: sorry if it came across like I support the guy. I don't. I'm just interested in sociology and politics. If you downvote me, could you explain what I'm getting wrong?
From what I understand, the military high command supported Yoon even after the assembly voted down martial law. If that's true, didn't he have everything to go through with the coup?
Resurgence of chauvinist parties?
Nah, I'm not a big party person, I wouldn't know
The industrial revolution and its consequences have b
Signing up on that instance and then going on political communities' posts is such a power-move
Yep, this is originally a righty post. That's why I'm so confused that it's actually kind of based. The rough consensus here is that it's based, so we have bi-partisan support. Let's get this on the Congress floor!
In the more fortunate situation, yes
Yeah, I get it, I'm just not American :D
