Lol, why in the world do you weirdos think USA should reign them in? Not thier party, not thier tamales.
I mean, that's the best side effect of their colonization. They brought Escoffier's technique to other regional cuisine.
Can you even imagine Vietnamese food without the heavy French influence?
You are the fascist problem of communism.
I mean, you're in the politics lemmy. And the most important country in the world is going through an election. You should pay attention.
Sure, they want war. And to kill all the Jews living in Isreal. You can't gaslight the world by repeating otherwise.
I stick with the majority of people on this planet and say Fuck Hamas and Hezbollah.
I think he is talking about Hamas, and Hezbollah. And the quotes he is referencing is probably all the times they say they hate the Jews and they should die. And the other religious my Abrahamic religion is the only real real one, yours is from Satan stuff.
Just a guess though. But I'm assuming that is what he is talking about.
You are more informed on some things than others, how much do you get paid to spread propaganda before a US election? Where do you go when the election is over?
These are the pressing questions lemmy is dying for.
I don't think Eugenics or racist is the correct ideas to use here. Less population just means smaller. Not a specific phenotype of human needs to be culled from existance. Just a smaller population.
All biological systems have population limits, and lots of evidence points that humans have passed those limits by quite a bit. Normally, there would be a population collapse due to food scarcity, but humans are capable of pushing those limits with agurcultural science. That doesn't mean that there are not huge determental effects on the world as a whole for there being an never ending exponential growth of people.
The part you wrote. The first post definitely, and then also this last post. It's the words you used, and then the order you placed those words in.
I mean, this shit has been going back and forth longer than we' been alive. Saying one side is the aggressor is using some pretty heavy blinders.
Your method of saying one combatant is wrong and the other combatant is good is laughable. It just reeks of insincerity and propaganda for some party that wants more war in the world.
You're just talking emotionally laden propaganda. From the way you talk, you just want war.
Why does this community think there shouldn't be a ground invasion after 1000s of missles are launched at a country? All I ever hear is emotionally charged statements against Israelis. But people keep punching the big kid and then keep getting mad when he punches back.
I'm responding to someone saying you can't debate it's a war crime. And your response is terrorism is not real.
You are a poor Russian troll, sir. And you should be worried someone will throw you out a window for your bad arguments.
I mean. It legally doesn't fall under the definition of terrorism, so there is that argument, lol.
I bet that felt good 👍. And your very small group of an echo chamber agreed with you.
The problem is you want to feel better. Not change something. Some people just like feeling better than others, others like making other things better.
This type of argument may make you feel better, but it doesn't really help anything but make you think better of yourself. Listen to what others say in discourse, or they won't listen to you.
Far too many make enemies out of allies and hurt their own cause in the process.
Lol, if there was an anti-anybody militia that sometimes acted against other states within the US. The US would raid their complex, set it on fire, and shoot people trying to escape.
Then, the government would blame the children and other non-combatants' deaths on the militia. The public then will watch documentaries made on the subject over dinner.
Pager bombs aimed at extremists are not an American concern. Even if there was a level of non-combatant causilities. If anything, it's a fun news blip of the week and will be forgotten in less than a month.