Really nice comment, mostly the last two paragraph.

Although in my experiences is the oposite with the "right-wing" of the subject, the more intellectual formation, deeper economic undertanding, more anarchist tend to be the people, and they also agree with what you said:

"That's because left-anarchism has more in common with capitalism than it has with communis"

I will add that from the ancap perspective, governament is not equal to state. A government is ok so far it is accepted voluntarily, in contrast, the state is always imposed using violence.

Anarchist:

Cospaia city (now part of Italy), almost 400y of ANCAP organization, untill ot was anexed by Italy near the 1800s. One of the top tobacco producers of his time, and relatively more prosperous than all his neibours.

Not bad for a tiny city with a population of 300~600.

It even didn't have prision nor police, no cohertion was needed to bring it to existence, no war, a bit of good luck and one really bad surveyor mapping the land.

Cuba, Vietnam, China.. ther is a difference in being sucessfull and just "being" I won't say they are succesful now, and in the long run I believe they will end to exist, one or two generations after us probably.

https://mises.org/power-market/republic-cospaia-anarchist-renaissance-city

The base of capitalism is freedom of choice and assosiation, and you are literally posting on a platform that emerged out of people acting in freedom, that is capitalism too

So, you mean that don't "gladly recieve" that kind of user but you don't ban them from using lemmy from their own instance, and even of you wantted to, you can't.

That sound really healthy in a broad sense , I mean for everyone even of it sound counterintuitive. For a moment I thought you can ban people from using Lemmy in general (not only from using your instance).

I think that FOSS in general has a good chance in the long run, and non-algoritmic feeds probably will help so low down the polarization or at least won't make ot wors (I hope).

That is why I love the fediverse in general! But when nutomic talks about the ex redditors from r/GenderCritical says

"Many reddit alternatives have been happy to embrace “reddits rejects”, no matter how bigoted those communities are, in the name of “free speech”. We don’t agree with this view, or with those who have nostalgia for a non-existent reddit past where it was more “free” and bigoted than it is now."

Is he talking about the instance in particular or refearing to lemmy in general? Maybe I misunderstood that

Is nice to know lemmy's history but the problem is:

who defines what is bigotry and what is not?

when a post si too comunist/libertarian/left/right... to be alowed?

The best of federates soclal network for me is that you can be in touch with you want to and be far away from those you don't want, but without the need to ask for your opposing group to be silenced, that just make the convivence online more pleasing