"Chunky" chicken soup in a can just costs a couple dollars, you could try heating that in a coffee pot. Add some fresh cherry tomatoes and canned fruit and you have a good meal.
you can’t get a sim card anonymously here, and i believe that’s the situation in other places.
It varies by country: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prepaid_mobile_phone#Privacy_rights
In the US you can still get a prepaid mobile without showing ID and pay with cash.
research has indicated that women and other minorities view risky job offers as the only chance they are likely to get.
What?! You mean he already gave up on NFTs?
Coming from Wired, I’d hope the article would have a more technology focused approach,
Wired is for people who want to talk about technology without actually taking about technology.
AI has been here before: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_winter
we have basically no way at all of influencing or thwarting them.
Maybe. The Spanish conquistadors, and the British in India, all found that it was easier to "divide and conquer" by picking local allies.
But surely no human would sell out their own species... right?
kbin.social direct link: https://kbin.social/m/printsf@literature.cafe/
But Hanlon's razor says you shouldn't.
All right, we got a razor fight!
Keep a choice synthwave track for when you have to show someone your screen.
Kind of like The Matrix if The Matrix was braindead.
Do you like commercials? And how much are you willing to pay for TV?
If the answers are "no" and "zero", then that's going to affect how much TV you/we watch, even if you/we like the TV shows.
According to the article, Musk is the ideas guy and it's her job to implement them. So when Twitter fails, he'll say the ideas were great, it was an execution problem.
She probably figures at her next job interview she'll say it was a no win situation, but at least she accomplished (something).
Also, "research has indicated that women and other minorities view risky job offers as the only chance they are likely to get" -Wikipedia
She's the one who will take the blame.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_cliff
The US version is one of the big 3 broadcast channels transmitting since the mid 1900s, though it's now also on cable:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Company
Clickbait. The writer is comparing historically-important books that are taught in literature classes to more modern books that can be read for fun.
Sure, we all read stuff for fun, that doesn't mean the books studied in literature classes are overrated.
Looks like OP just added the title.
I can't make out what's in her hand. A watch? The medals left by her dead father? The tiny suspenders of her child who died at a young age?
More info about governesses:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governess
https://www.mimimatthews.com/2015/06/15/the-literary-governess-depictions-in-austen-bronte-thackeray-and-heyer/
A fair-minded article. This sounded off though:
a big attraction of Reddit—that its main page is a kind of greatest hits of an enormous community.
No, r/all was the lowest common denominator, full of karmafarming, ragebait, and reposts. Every time I looked at r/all I regretted it, so I mostly stuck to subreddits.