Yeah any normal citizen would go to prison and permanently be banned from using any computer but shady companies need to be sued from megacorps and even then the best outcome is that they don't continue to hack that companies devices.
It's no surprise that movements like the sovereign citizens believe in magic words that allow them to get away with weird stuff when they see that this is true for these entities. The mistake these groups make is not having a lobby group that turns their insanity into law - but I also don't want to imagine a world where everyone can act like NSO.
Both the wording of the rule and the use of the rule was very clear that this was about all criticism of Israel unless it's "criticism" like "Israel doesn't do enough to protect itself".
That "guideline" is hate-speech and genocide-apologism in it's most cynical form because it is disguised as anti-discrimination. The people who proposed and implemented it should be ostracized.
In the US they seem to get away with that tactic.
Potemkin would be proud of those 'rules'.
I suggest adding John Deer. Their current business model relies on violating GPL.
https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/17/john_deere_sfc_gpl/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP7Qx1FF1hA
I'm using that term due to Séjourné using that reasoning, I changed it to reflect his wording more precisely.
I do not agree with him, that is why I inserted the "somehow".
He wants to apply the law to everyone. Except to Israel, because accusing the jewish state of crimes they actually commit is somehow immoral.
Why do you think the two are exclusive?
"Most moral army in the world fires rocket artillery at journalists in a neighboring country for the crime of using a tripod."
At first I thought you're trying to simply mock the position, then I reread the other comment and withdrew my upvote.
It's not only the last sentence that is terrible - it's the last two. And sadly I don't think this is satirical.
With the information about the organzied harassment campaign that is openly available, I feel confident in judging that group as agitators and lawyers that terrorize human rights advocates.
At first I thought it was literally about the concept of infinity.
I'm a desktop User
"Of course you should fight fire with fire. You should fight everything with fire."
— Jaya Ballard, task mage
But then surely "it has always been this way" is not true.
I have no disagreement about that. I only wanted to convey that not 100% of it is a bubble.
I have some experience working as a webdev and I don't exactly understand why "non-desktop-browsers" would "not work" when desktop-browsers work. That isn't the case unless you specifically and intentionally make it that way.
That and the video where you are being captured and put into a vat of a green glowing substance.
There is plenty of AI that is already in use (for example in medical diagnostics and engeneering) so we can safely say that it isn't "one giant bubble" - it might be overhyped when it comes to certain aspects like the ability to write a coherent and creative book that would have success on the market.
It looks like this is for US citizens only. If I am wrong please correct me.