I personally don't care, copyright only effects people actually trying to make money off of it. I think it's a futile attempt to make AI generated images/art seem illegitimate.
Did this one 2 months ago https://lemmynsfw.com/post/377359
Using terms like "teacher" and "news anchor" produce some really good results. I think it accesses a part of the models which have much more variety than terms like "model" "beautiful woman" which are more generic.
Some more variants same model similar prompt
prompt: "(pixar dreamlight valley), (adult sexy orgasm female woman game character, naked), (tight panties, long hair), (beautiful summer night background charming moonlit)"
adetailer: "(disney pixar 3d render, sexual confused orgasm orgasmic emotion emotional face, happy smiling squinting shy blush cringe slut embarrassed:1)"
model: realistic vision 5.1
I used this model https://civitai.com/models/4201 v4.0 with a couple LORAs.
Almost all of the hands are a giveaway, I kind of like leaving the hands a bit deformed in my hyper-realistic generations because I don't want them to be mistaken for real images. Mostly I just don't want to go to the trouble of fixing them because it takes way more effort lol.
Yea it's probably good to be a bit cautious when generating realistic clothing on animals, could get very NSFW very quicky. 😅
The question doesn't make sense. Anthropomorphizing a human would result in... a human human? Unless you're referring to a specific animal, like trying to make a giraffe human by anthropomophizing a giraffe which is non-human.
It's not letting me embed images for some reason. "not valid JSON" ? 😐
EDIT: I figured it out, I had to type ""
This is 2023, don't judge them.