Retrospective Discussion | Doctor Who (2005) | 1x09 "The Empty Child"
Retrospective Discussion | Doctor Who (2005) | 1x09 "The Empty Child"
Fanhome Star Trek Starships Updates — First Looks at the Voyager-A and Archer, Tariff Impacts, and a Delayed Excelsior
Inside the Making of the ‘Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’ Murder Mystery Episode
Watch “A Space Adventure Hour” From ‘Strange New Worlds’ For Free
Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Strange New Worlds | 3x04 "A Space Adventure Hour"
Winnipeg's Louise Bridge changed the course of history, but its future is uncertain
Puppets Explained, Sybok Teased, TAS Episode Scrapped, And More ‘Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’ SDCC Reveals
Canada pledges $30M in Gaza aid, $10M for Palestinian Authority work toward statehood
Kinew cabinet uses order to dismiss appeals against Chinese miner's environmental licence
CFL 2025 - Week 9 Discussion Thread
‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’ Showunners Talk 32nd Century Setting And How The Ship Is Part Of The School
Welcome to the party, Steven Moffat.
The improved quality of this episode is immediately apparent. The script is tight and quippy, and the titular child is creepy as hell.
It's tough to comment solely on a Part 1, but there's a lot to like in this. The gag of the Doctor asking the crowd at the cabaret whether they've seen anything falling from the sky before realizing he's landed in the middle of the London Blitz is great. The production quality is generally excellent - it really feels like a specific time and place.
Following on that, Nancy is an immediately compelling character - sympathetic, and very authentic-feeling to the setting. Richard Wilson is also very good as Dr. Constantine.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I think the weakest part of the episode by far is the subplot with Rose and Captain Jack Harkness, who we meet for the first time here. It feels incongruous with the horror vibes of the A-plot, and I don't actually think John Barrowman (scandal noted) is as charming as the script needs him to be.