I know ;)

You dont have to be tolerant of intollerance imho.

Thanks for letting me know

What are they supposed to be for you?

Memes are supposed to be funny Maybe it went over my head

Imagine there are still people chilling for this Nazi piece of shit.

And I don't use that word lightly. He has done enough to be getting this label.

You are just stating that, what is your reasoning?

Also, how do you think this is a meme, if you honestly think this?

That's not a reason.

Yeah, like an old IOS on an old iPhone, that doesn't get updates anymore?

Oh, a shill in the wild.

Wife of a friend is also named Karen, she is a wonderful person.

My friendgroup still really like Karen memes, but she somehow doesn't :D

I am not talking about feeling attacked, but rather to not give anti-societal movements any platform.

Also, that ideology is not based in factual arguments, so why would arguing succeed? The real solution would be for them to get to know foreigners to seez that they are just people, but that doesn't happen on twitter.

Yes, I see the difference, but its indicative of his ideology I think.

He lets Nazis use his platform and calls it "freedom of speech", although this exact freedom is limited by the wellbeing of others. And promoting Nazis is harmful to not only minorities, but the society in my opinion, as they strive to split the society with populist arguments.

So you know the hidden truth?

So its no longer intellectual property if its on the internet? The nerves on this guy...

So you could just copy and use every single helpful support article from Microsoft?

Oh shit, there aren't any

Sorry, yeah maybe that wasn't the best response.

But you still claiming nuclear is green is just crazy. There is still no place on earth that can hold nuclear waste. Especially not for the thousands of years that it would need. There is nothing clean about energy, that produces waste, that we can't even handle.

Also, the energy mix in Denmark is very renewable wherever possible (https://ens.dk/en/our-services/statistics-data-key-figures-and-energy-maps/annual-and-monthly-statistics)

Okay, where is the comparison to nuclear? For that you have to build massive infrastructure, that costs billions, that no one want to insure, thats why it has to be backed by state money. After that the waste has to be managed by the state too, because no company wants to deal with the liability of radioactive waste for thousands of years at least, so that, too, comes out of the taxpayers pockets.

I don't like fossil fuels, but this is just plain stupid

(and also as a cherry on top, tschernobyl, fokushima)

Renewables are better, cheaper and more scalable. Its not even close. Look at Denmark for how it can be done.

You could say if you're serious or not, but hey

Or maybe im dense, or a combination, who knows. But for sure went over my head ^^