Skip Navigation
Jump
Don't use Appimages (a writeup about all the reasons they are a pain for users)
  • They mimic the apple application format to some degree and it is a great way to distribute. The real detriment is sandboxing but with more support this could be included.

    4
  • Jump
    10 Commandmends for a digital age
  • I asked a simple question in good faith and the response started with my account being an 8 month old bot account. The poster is not defending their list in good faith, they attack posts that question them, then block you.

    1
  • Jump
    10 Commandmends for a digital age
  • I'll say, the sensitivity surrounding this is beyond reproach. I asked how one of the line items related specifically to the "Digital Age" and you immediately responded with negativity. What an odd response.

    2
  • Jump
    10 Commandmends for a digital age
  • This is most certainly not "literally" an alt account. There is no need to constantly post. So congratulations on that mischaracterization.

    1
  • https:// www.cbp.gov /document/foia-record/unidentified-aerial-phenomenon

    Some very interesting footage taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency.

    0
    www.theblackvault.com Newly Released Documents Shed Light on "UFO Whistleblower" David Grusch's DOPSR Review - The Black Vault

    In a recent release of documents obtained via FOIA case 23-F-0946, new information has surfaced surrounding the media-nicknamed “UFO Whistleblower,” David Grusch. Grusch, who has claimed to have knowledge regarding “non-human intelligence”—believed by many to refer to extraterrestrial beings—had mad...

    I vouch for the US FOIA process when it's not being stonewalled but this article has a disingenuous take. The BlackVault has in the past called on whistleblowers to testify to Congress under oath and now the goalpost has shifted. They want more to prove their statements. Even under oath DG stated the DOPSR report only clears it for it's classification not it's validity. Unfortunately, this is not enough. This is just another attack at a whistleblower who put their money where there mouth is and testified under oath to Congress.

    1

    This is a huge win for future hearings and movement for disclosure. P.S.They replicated some of the names (Moskowitz joked about this).

    2

    The new AARO site was just released for the masses.

    2
    blog.torproject.org Introducing Proof-of-Work Defense for Onion Services | Tor Project

    Today, we are officially introducing a proof-of-work (PoW) defense for onion services designed to prioritize verified network traffic as a deterrent against denial of service (DoS) attacks with the release of Tor 0.4.8.

    This is a new PoW protocol that will be used to defend against DDOSs

    6
    Jump
    Rep. Turner crying foul against more UAP hearings
  • If you are referring to DG, then I feel this sentiment is misplaced. He interviewed first hand accounts with the evidence necessary to take the message to the forefront. Also, if Sen. Rubio, and Sen. Gillibrand are to be believed they confirmed that witnesses feel threatened for their lives, in some cases. Armed with this knowledge we can only guess why these first hand accounts would prefer a 3rd party intermediary providing the ammunition to the public. The only hope we can have is that in private these reports are being given to Congress, which, again, based of the senators appears to be the case.

    6
  • This presents a serious development and conflict that needs to be addressed.

    22
    Jump
    1561 Celestial Phenomenon over Nuremberg
  • The night after the UAP Hearing I was discussing with people about the possible connection between the craft discussed in the hearing and this very event. Truely marvelous seeing such a connection.

    2
  • It is with a heavy heart and a determined spirit that I stand, under oath, before you today, having made the decision based on the data I collected, and reported, to provide this information to the committee. I am driven in this duty by a conviction to expose what I viewed as a grave congressional oversight issue and a potential abuse of executive branch authorities.

    This endeavor was not born out of malice or dissatisfaction, but from an unwavering commitment to truth and transparency, an endeavor rooted in our inherent duty to uphold the United States Constitution, protect the American People, and seek insights into this matter that have the potential to redefine our understanding of the world.

    In an era, fraught with division and discord, our exploration into the UAP subject seems to resonate with an urgency and fascination that transcends political, social, and geographical boundaries. A democratic process must be adhered to when evaluating the data and it is our collective responsibility to ensure that public involvement is encouraged and respected.

    Indeed, the future of our civilization and our comprehension of humanity’s place on earth and in the cosmos depends on the success of this very process.

    It is my hope that the revelations we unearth through investigations of the Non-Human Reverse Engineering Programs I have reported will act as an ontological (earth-shattering) shock, a catalyst for a global reassessment of our priorities.

    As we move forward on this path, we might be poised to enable extraordinary technological progress in a future where our civilization surpasses the current state-of-the-art in propulsion, material science, energy production and storage.

    The knowledge we stand to gain should spur us toward a more enlightened and sustainable future, one where collective curiosity is ignited, and global cooperation becomes the norm, rather than the exception.

    Thank You

    0

    My office will be working with @RepTimBurchett , @RepMoskowitz , and any other Congressional Representative or Senator that wants to get on board to obtain info/documents from the Inspector General as suggested by @ChrisKMellon . The public deserves to know the truth.… https://t.co/7EnuTJx7XE

    https://twitter.com/realannapaulina/status/1683682165526081537

    0
    https:// twitter.com /ask_a_pol/status/1681791399295942657

    BREAKING NEWS:

    EXCLUSIVE: Ask a Pol has confirmed—UFO whistleblower David Grusch is scheduled to testify in next week's House hearing https://t.co/CBkztVRYvj

    0
    https:// twitter.com /ddeanjohnson/status/1681479853193691141

    CONGRESS UPDATE

    1. The U.S. Senate today (July 18, 2023) moved the FY 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (S. 2226) through its first procedural gate, 72-25. The new Schumer-Rounds Amendment ("UAP Disclosure Act") was added to the bill without objection,
    0

    Body of tweet:

    #ufotwitter

    We held the 1st meeting of attorneys yesterday w/ Danny Sheehan and Derek Garcia.

    We are preparing to file lawsuits (dozens or more) against the contractors that are holding the anamolous tech imminently.

    Contractors can take the amnesty offer to stop these suits.

    0

    -- David Grusch and other credible individuals have provided the IC IG details about an alleged program involving recovered ET technology. Since AARO does not have this information, Congress ought to ask the IC IG to assess the issue and report what it learns. --

    0
    Jump
    Why is the most popular computer os closed source while the most popular mobile os is open source?
  • MacOS is derived from Darwin but heavily modified and now closed source. While GPL is copy left, BSD has no such requirement so you can effectively make your derivative OS closed source, which NeXT and subsequently Apple did.

    3
  • Jump
    Why is the most popular computer os closed source while the most popular mobile os is open source?
  • In a nutshell Android uses Linux as it's base so I don't believe they could make it closed source, where Microsoft Windows, like Apple MacOS, have always used their "own" kernel allowing them the flexibility to keep their software closed source or source available.

    16
  • https:// lweb.cfa.harvard.edu /~loeb/LK1.pdf

    An interesting prepublication paper written by Dr. Avi Loeb and Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick.

    0

    Some questions and comments

    1. This SCG explicitly talks about Navy Intelligence. So would this SCG be applied to another branch?
    2. Were the programs that David Grusch mentioned under the Navy?
    3. Are SCGs retroactive? If so, where would it apply?
    4. If an SCG talked about ET materials would congress question it? What does the SCG state that falls in line with David Grusch's testimony on camera and behind closed doors?
    0