abraham_linksys @ abraham_linksys @sh.itjust.works

Posts

3

Comments

133

Joined

2 yr. ago

Religious Nobel winners becoming great minds in spite of their superstitions have nothing to do with thousands of years of scientific suppression by religions all over the world.

People don't like their worldview challenged, but when your worldview is absurd and without evidence you'll constantly be dealing with these challenges as people learn and ask more questions. If itt turns out the sun isn't actually pulled across the sky by a god on a chariot every day, then what else is just nature and not a god? It disrupts your society, and has to be put down and people need to be distracted away from questioning the gods (and the people in high positions).

Religion has always been at war with curiosity, reason and (new) evidence. It's the nature of being based on a fallacy, which is the assertion that god(s) exist without proof.

Who the fuck said anything about restricting free speech? You keep trying to put words in my mouth.

I said fuck em and I don't respect them and I like to harass them while they're harassing others. Not "the government should do blank because my feelings are hurt by speech". I said I'd be fine with deporting refugees that use asylum deceitfully to push their agenda, but that's probably unrealistic and would probably be used to hurt innocents.

Ancient mythology doesn't suddenly deserve respect just because large groups of people decide they're gonna take it literally and force it on everyone else every chance they get.

It must be hard being religious in a world of science. You have to rely on distractions and half truths and obvious lies because your world view is so completely fucked that you are constantly at war with reality itself.

Too bad religion doesn't coexist well with intelligence or education. It's hard to be dumb, ignorant AND at battle with reality in every conversation with people outside your religion.

All that is to say, your post is a weak attempt to misdirect the conversation away from a government pushing their own refugees in a foreign country to force their religious bullshit on their host country.

Who said anything about militant atheism? I'm not the guy harassing strangers with my religious beliefs in public, but I am the guy mocking and embarrassing them (if they're even capable of shame)

I don't give a fuck what country someone is from. You don't deserve respect when you go out and harass and insult strangers. Being a refugee and insulting your host country is even worse in my opinion. Deport those snakes, they obviously miss home. How dare they come up another country claiming to be seeking help and then spit on them like that.

Oh I'm not being obtuse I understand the problem, I just think if USPS is 100% self funded then it should just be a private company.

I speak from ignorance though, is there any benefit to being subject to this political fuckery?

My wife hates it but I LOVE antagonizing the religious snakes who try to tell you about their bullshit in public. I grew up in the Bible Belt and I fucking HATE that fake "oh I'm just trying to save your immortal soul because you're a sinner" bullshit. Fuck these people, they're predators preying on people at their weakest and they don't pay taxes while pissing their influence all over our politics.

Fuck. These. People. All of them.

I don't stop walking but I always interrupt them or put words in their mouths or ask why their all powerful god won't do anything about pedos when they're screeching about that etc. Especially the ones that try to hand you things, love them! They're always carrying a bunch of papers that you can knock out of their hands.

I hope these fuckwits meet lots of friendly people like me as they go to SOMEONE ELSE'S FUCKING COUNTRY to force their mythology on 😁

Anime was a mistake

Brendan Eich is an asshole deep in the Conspiracy Victim Complex too. I like Brave search as an alternative to Google but I'm still using Firefox

We need to build special roads so self driving cars can navigate properly.

You could even connect self driving cars together, by letting the front car pull them the others could save their batteries.

And with these "trains" of self driving cars pulling each other, you wouldn't have to build the self driving car roads very wide, they could just run on narrow "tracks" for the wheels.

Then we'd have more space for human stuff instead of car stuff like roads and parking lots everywhere.

He's done it again. Elon Musk is a god damn genius.

The postal service is 100% self funded due to republicans who can't or won't understand the concept of a public service.

Why the fuck is any of this political anymore?

If you live outside the city, you don't pay taxes in the city.

If you don't pay taxes in the city, it means local taxpayers are paying for YOUR car to wear down roads, add to traffic congestion, make lots of noise and take up space wherever you park it.

This is why there are toll roads, parking fees, fuel taxes and other additional charges (in this case for noise and pollution) in cities.

So if poor people living outside the city REALLY can't use public transit to get to the city (which I doubt tbh I've been all over Europe for work including suburbs and rural areas entirely by train and bus) then they just have to fucking pay for the extra space, pollution and damage they cause with their cars.

Cars don't deserve special treatment so they can fuck up cities even more than they already do. Just look at American cities, they're all roads and parking lots thanks to cars 😭

America makes a lot more sense when you think of it as a corporation with nukes rather than a country with functional government.

I'm not sure when or how it happened, but Americans seem to have decided that everything has to be privately owned for profit, and making those private services into government services (health care for example) it's "socialism" and people would rather pay 5x as much for less care than our European cousins get with their taxes by default.

My friends we're not talking about America here. There is infrastructure and a social culture beyond "why should government help it's own people fuck you get a car". There are lots of ways to get around by bus or train or bike and they're all way cheaper which is good for poor folks.

In America you'd be right, we make our poor and everyone else pay 10x what they'd spend on transit to pay for a car, car insurance, gas, parking, toll roads and repairs. Then defund every other form of transit, build our cities for cars instead of people and call it Freedom.

London has one of the best transit systems in the world. A car is not necessary.

If you want to take up a shitload of extra space and pollute everywhere you go with fumes and noise then you get to pay extra. It's a choice, not a necessity.

Doesn't work forever though. Used to be the same with Microsoft and Internet Explorer, but better things came along that were less terrible and not controlled by a single tech company throwing their weight around to push their own standards.

It'll happen again if Google restricts the extension store much more though. They've been attacking ad and privacy extensions for years

But if that were the case, wouldn't GDPR already be used to take down TOR or torrents or any other p2p tech? All it would take is someone's personal information being on them, right? (I'm really asking I have no idea)

They never really recovered from the 2008 financial collapse. That's when everything became a sequel/prequel/reboot. Technology and streaming didn't help but I remember it happening really fast after 2008.

These are the kind of people that would ask, "other than that, how did you enjoy the play Mrs. Lincoln?"