Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AL
帖子
0
评论
522
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Sorry to disagree.

    It's not about Amazon or Temu. Here in the Netherlands, we actually did protect our market and two Dutch online stores are more popular than Amazon.

    There is just a huge shift to online shopping due to convenience and cost. There is just less demand for physical stores.

    Some of the online shops do open physical showrooms. Relatively small stores (think Apple store) where people can see some of the more expensive stuff before buying.

    But huge malls and department stores will only be a thing for the largest cities and for outlets, to attract people who like to physically shop.

    The smaller malls and department stores just aren't needed anymore and will forever disappear from our landscapes.

  • I'm pretty sure they were serious when they said 2024 was going to be the last election.

    I predict a Republican supermajority in the midterms. They will just hack the voting machines or remove all democratic voters from the rolls.

  • People have the memory of a goldfish nowadays.

    I was alive during the 2000 and 2008 market crashes, but also the 2020 non-crash.

    It could be that Tesla really has cracked autonomous driving by summer, as Elon claims, and then they will recover a lot of market value.

    But more realistically, as the saying goes, even a dead cat bounces.

    Markets never go down in perfect lines. There are dead cat bounces along the way.

  • People don't realize how fucked Tesla is.

    If protestors burn just 0.1% of Tesla cars on the road every year, then that means insurance companies will need to charge an additional $200-$500 per year to insure a Tesla compared to a similar car of any other brand.

    If they burn 1%, then it's more like $2000 per year in extra insurance costs.

    They will become uninsurable.

  • You have no idea what they did or did not do.

    You have no idea what they went through in the USA.

    Look, I get you. I come from a family that actively resisted the Nazi occupation with guns, smuggling and at great risk.

    And if it ever came to it, I would stay to fight. That's just my nature.

    But it's not for everyone.

  • Dude, I understand your frustration.

    But these people just want to be safe and raise their kids without worrying that some neo-nazis are going to harm them or their kids for having the wrong race or creed.

    They aren't necessarily affluent, though not poor either. Just middle-class progressive people that need to have both parents working to afford a house, car, groceries.

    Yes, I am sorry you got f-d by the medical costs. I really wish it were different.

  • I'm European, and I get miserable reading about the USA.

    It's also quite telling that I see so many American expats here nowadays. It used to be quite rare, usually if you met an American living here they would be either working for an American company, or have a relationship with a local.

    Now, I'm just meeting a lot of super talented and smart Americans who took a major paycut just to not live in the US anymore.

  • Yes, people are sadly dumb and fall for bad messaging. I recognize that as a weakness.

    The messaging should therefore be: lower property taxes for normal people by making it progressive and combating tax evasion by foreign investors.

    My scheme significantly empowers normal people vs. speculators/investors. Speculators need a positive return to justify their investment.

    Therefore, it will basically put a moat around the housing market that greatly benefits owner-occupiers.

  • I like your thinking. Personally, I prefer easier schemes that are difficult to avoid.

    Schemes like yours, while good on paper, are often circumvented through shell companies and foreign residency.

    I prefer a scheme where we just tax all real estate at a quite high rate, somewhere in the 1-5% range. Let's say that a simple apartment would then result in €5K tax. A family home €10K.

    Every citizen gets to subtract up to €5K of property tax from their income tax. So a family might pay €20K income tax, but can subtract €10K.

    End result is a progressive property tax, which actually decreases tax on normal people.

    People with expensive homes, foreign owners of homes and people who own multiple homes would be paying significantly more tax without the possibility to subtract it

  • Here in the Netherlands, the government agency for housing has the figures on how many second homes people own, but refuses to publish it.

    Journalists have estimated that the number is about equal to the number of people looking for a house. About 400K on a population of 18M.

    The scarcity is artificial.

  • Also the post-WW2 world order heavily favours their economy.

    Their allies buy their debt, and their weapons. They give access to theiir markets to US companies, and support US wars around the world. They invest in the US economy in an unbalanced way that favours the US economy.

    And all of this was in exchange for US security.

  • Thanks for posting.

    That war cost a million Iraqi lives (calculated by excess deaths). And not to forget all the others killed by the sanctions in the 90s and the Iran-Iraq war in the 80s, where the USA actually allied with Saddam and egged him on to start it.

    For Iraq, the USA truly was the evil empire.

  • I don't know why the Brexiteers are pumping this narrative again.

    No, I don't for one minute believe that Macron would jeopardize European security just for fishing rights. There is no way that Poland, Germany and the Netherlands would accept that.

    I do believe that the politicians are working on a slightly grander deal that will restore trade between the UK and EU. Such a deal could be defended on both sides against critics as "a necessary compromise to secure Europe".

    And Labour will benefit from the economic growth, which they hope will let them keep a majority next elections.