yes, if by remotely disable you mean getting destroyed by US missiles the moment chinese troops lay a foot in Taiwan.
of all the motives to be against open carry, putting cringe as one of them is ... cringe.
You talk like it's a done deal and recent talks about a referendum to revisit never existed.
do you want a cookie?
[insert obama awarding obama meme here]
I mean the UK won't return Gilbraltar to Spain who were in the EU with them they won't obviously return the falklands.
I'd like to see the UK also defending the "vote of the people" if Ireland voted to leave the UK
do you think the schools have the resources to "launch an investigation" every time there's a fight? you may end up with one side of the story anyways, that's ridiculous. don't ask from a school stuff with what the justice system struggles.
this coming from someone who used podman for years for hours for development every day.
podman is cancer, it's way better to use docker rootless.
podman will break if you sneeze at it, and the only recourse you will find in github is to podman system reset which stinks of bad programming.
docker rootless never breaks, podman may die if you cancel a download because the devs were either inexperienced or bad and instead of protecting the state with atomic filesystem operations they leave dirty files in working directories which make it fail in random and unexpected ways.
You pay it by buying new hardware.
My 2013 macbook pro with 16 GB of RAM and 1 TB SSD has been deprecated by apple so the latest OS it gets is Big Sur, it has now been barred from signing updates (since they require the latest XCode which I cannot get with Big Sur) so its only viable life is via Linux from now on.
I have had to buy a Mac Mini with 8 GB of RAM and a 250 GB SSD to be able to upload updates for my iOS apps.
I mean I can afford it, but yeah, we are paying for OS updates dude.
That's the reason they also updated their EULAs to set a minimum renting period of 24hs for providers like Amazon and MacStadium. They want you buying hardware, they don't want to leave any easy way out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiqDZlAZygU rowan atkison on the paradox of tolerance.
People always forget about the rules of the internet.
Rule 29: On the internet men are men, women are also men, and kids are undercover FBI agents.
Rule 30: Girls do not exist on the internet
the fucking gall of calling massa centrist. shit-tier journalism.
we have problems with governments over printing. this shit has happened again and again for decades and it won't stop.
Google has banned whole accounts of some users for copy pasting comments on Youtube chat (similar to what people do on Twitch).
https://9to5google.com/2019/11/09/google-account-bans-youtube-emote-spam-markiplier
I wouldn't gamble on it.
PSA: skirting their attempts to block ad blockers if you have a Google account you would rather keep may be unwise.
Google has been known for banning people for stupid crap, and this checks all the boxes.
While they were silent on this topic there was a gentlemen's agreement that you could block ads. But now that they have voiced their opinion the jig is up.
I'd recommend people to use an alternative account if they are going to block anyway and they want to keep their gmail.
to be fair, the ones that don't look like a 12 year old probably weren't caught.
It seems funny at first, but knowing they don't hate a media twisted version of you, but the real thing, is more depressing than funny.
it's not that simple, the biggest argument is that the core of the problem that made someone homeless is still there.
if you made someone obese fit with swish-and-flick of a magic wand, they would end up fat again in a couple of years, because being fit is much more than just having muscles instead of fat.
I'm not saying that every homeless is in the same situation of course, but you have to fix the problem that let them spiral down before trying to fix the problem by just throwing money at it.