oh you watch videos and it's hard to concentrate after a while? Welcome to actual driving jobs

Watching videos is comparable to e.g. ATC work. I don't see driving as comparable. In one you're actively doing something. In the others you're only checking for stuff that might go wrong but usually goes ok.

There's a significant difference in ATC vs the training AI: in ATC work people are swapped out after a few hours and they have regular breaks. While here for that AI the company is pretending it can be done for an 8 hour shift.

I have no doubt that we will likewise see the mental and physical effort of driving as well as the danger of it become as unconscionable as threshing or machine operator work is to us now.

Meh, that's been said for ages. Currently the reliability of automated driving is often crazily overestimated. Human driving is pretty reliable, especially on highways.

Change for the better is good. But just because there's a computer involved doesn't mean it's already better or that'll be foolproof.

Only for certain people, likely based upon race. The usual rules for some, not for others.

The rich usually ensure that there are enough gigantic exceptions. And these exceptions often aren't reported upon.

And maybe he believes the trickle down economy bs.

People are paying way too little attention to this.

The media conveniently ignores it. Loads of media companies are for profit instead of reporting what's going on. Media is needed in a democracy. Unfortunately media being a business makes them easy to be bought.

There are different type of smoke alarms. Some detect smoke. There are two ways of doing that. Near a kitchen area it's usually best to get a completely different one that just uses changes in temperature. Though they will only notify you way matter. So highly recommend keeping the existing one and moving that one somewhere else.

Might not be enough. Apparently they have better plans in place to manipulate the voting proces into (incorrectly) declaring Trump and others the winner, even if the votes say something else.

That said, the amount of troubleshooting and wasted time that it took to figure out that the CPU was responsible for months of random crashes

I went through something similar, so I understand.

My (AMD) CPU was defective. But if was only noticeable that it would never be able to wake up from suspend. I didn't really notice crashes. Just broken suspend. I thought it was a Linux kernel bug, though couldn't figure out any details. Only after almost a year of pain (no suspend) the CPU just didn't boot at all anymore.

It was sort of replaced under warranty by the store. They took ages to investigate, then gave a store gift card. Likely because the CPU was temporarily out of stock. I had to wait for the CPU to be in stock to be able to buy it again. Fortunately still had the previous AM4 CPU.

The new CPU suspends without any issues. Took months to be able to not doubt suspend. E.g. if it was suspended I usually thought it had crashed.

An unreliable CPU is a terrible experience.

Read what you wrote again. It is full of contradictions. If it's for everybody, then why do you want to exclude people? If it is niche, then why suddenly is it full of rich people?

Suggest to lay off following whatever right wing media you're following. Especially those who blame everything on a small group, trans, drag, women, race, etc.

Your statement screams

...something that's not similar/equivalent.

McDonald's is not consistent though. A hamburger can often be flimsy thin. I don't get why you'd go there. There are enough fast food options with lower prices. McDonald's is often really terrible.

Renewables are cheaper than coal. And the replacement wasn't limited to gas and coal. There are articles which explained that there wasn't a massive increase in e.g. coal usage.

The CNN article article also briefly puts a high figure for coal on energy, which could lead to confusion.

Sky mentioned it over and over during the race. Easier to pretend it's only this instead of listening to the complaints Max has been making for multiple races.

There's usually multiple causes of why something happens. But it's often pretended it's a singular thing. So the sleeping is pointed to, and then the other causes can be ignored.

Especially as everyone knows that they don't have the same advantage. Last year it wouldn't make sense to try and defend a position against Max due to the massive difference in lap times. Currently it might be pretty easy to hold him off.

Does Max start ahead of Perez or behind Perez after the penalty is applied?

Most logically is that Max is still ahead. So I'll go with behind Perez, because else it would be too damn clear how bad the situation is.

the meltdown from Horner and Marko will be something worth watching.

Aren't those two divided on which driver their prefer? Also, Horner tried to get rid of Marko, no?

Ocon prefers being faster than his teammates over anything else, so yeah, I'm really wondering how that behaviour and the likely stupid/unneeded incidents reflect on Bearman.

I'm amazed that you think Ricciardo is performing at an equal level as Tsunoda. Then I checked and it seemed for the last 5 races or so Ricciardo finished higher. Quite surprising, I basically wrote Ricciardo off ages ago!

Anyway, Ricciardo had it difficult after not being able to perform in McLaren. Not exactly sure if he's able to handle pressure still. Finishing slightly better than Tsunoda for a few races isn't that impressive to me.

Putting Lawson directly in the Red Bull is probably too much of a risk

Agreed.

Quite curious as to what is going to happen. There's (was?) a power struggle in Red Bull, seems different people there have different drivers as their preference. They seem to be stubborn.

You started this thread with a fallacy...

Uh and what has changed for the muskrat to suddenly grow a smidge of conscious?

It's best to really doubt what Musk says. Likely he's still giving money but using weasel words to pretend he's not because of the fallout.

A lot of that research isn't done by these companies. Further, their marketing budget is often huge, the research budget is often lower than that.

So instead of accepting that the driver should be GPL and part of the kernel, you turn things around and pretend the development of the kernel is the way that it is because of a conspiracy against Nvidia?

The bit regarding Wayland doesn't make sense, no idea what you're getting at. Though maybe you don't follow Linux developments?