h3artbl33d :openbsd: :ve: @ h3artbl33d @exquisite.social

Hacker | OpenBSD | InfoSec | Coffee addict | Todays paranoia is tomorrows t

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

6

Joined

3 yr. ago

@Sunny

Yay! Congratulations :flanhurrah: That action looks good on you! :flancool:

@stefano@bsd.cafe

That would be lovely. AFAIK Gcam is more feature complete but the results should be the same. My (personal) beef with Gcam is that it is obtained through the Play Store.

Which is okay, but I have no desire to run even Sandboxed Google Play in my main, daily driver profile. And switching to a secondary to take a photo seems a lot of trouble.

How do you go about this? Everything within one user (the owner profile) or more segmented?

@stefano@bsd.cafe

Wow! Amazing photo. Do you feel like you should be able to get the same result with the GrapheneOS Camera app? It does use the same CameraX API IIRC.

@stefano@bsd.cafe

Is this photo made with gcam on the Pixel or the iPhone 13 Pro Plus?

@stefano@bsd.cafe @rqm@exquisite.social

I was always taught that the inception of babies was supposed to be private. Was my upbringing wrong or am I missing something? :flan_XD:

@stefano@bsd.cafe @ParadeGrotesque@mastodon.sdf.org

I think it is ffmpeg that does that. I am not entirely sure how I feel about it. Optimizations: yes, please. But if those images really criple the media I am not in favor anymore.