Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HA
Posts
3
Comments
47
Joined
7 days ago

  • Yep. It's all about breeding anyone out of the gene pool whose families are in a position to resist the ruling class.

    There will be 2 kinds of people in the future: the haves, and the have-nots. Just like in the past.

    We only have ourselves to blame. For decades now, we've been fighting the people who fight back instead of just simply fighting back (or doing nothing). That kind of cuck-behavior catches up with us, and now it's too late to change course.

  • Running a woman twice was definitely stupid on the democrats' part. Regardless of what you believe, the fact is that people are way less accepting of other sexes than other races. Any historian will confirm this; it's not a point of debate.

    Instead of blaming people for not voting for a woman that represents the ruling class, we should blame everyone who made sure we don't have a candidate that represents the working class.

    The democrats have shown their hand several times; they'd rather have trump than someone who fights for the working class so that's what we get.

    If Kamala wins, democrats win. If trump wins, democrats still win because rich people keep getting richer while everyone else suffers.

    I still blame everyone who voted for hillary clinton in the 2016 primary for why we now have 2 trump presidencies. You need to keep in mind, a lot of people voted for her in the primary specifically because she was female and it was 'her turn.' (to lose to trump)

  • It's a two-pronged strategy.

    Democrats legitimately do not care about their constituents. The role of democrats is that of a 'ratchet,' to lock-in any gains the republicans get by making sure there's no opposition to fight back.

    The average person is an idiot and the 2-party system should reinforce that notion every election.

  • Does it tout itself as open?

    I don't have much respect for the software, and even less respect for the useful idiots praising it despite never having used it.

    It's my understanding that it's proprietary software, but you can use it for free and only have to pay if you make money off of a program developed with it.

  • Today I Learned @lemmy.world

    TIL most cars have a black box that records information leading up to a crash

    Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Are the Sentinelese still alive?

    Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Is there a process by which courts check access logs of a server to verify the data hasn't been tampered with?