haloduder @ haloduder @thelemmy.club

Posts

6

Comments

146

Joined

2 wk. ago

You're the one following me around and replying to my posts everywhere.

You're projecting and I'm going to ignore you now because you're also becoming a nuisance. Goodbye.

Yes they are.

You've just been duped into thinking they're not.

Hopefully we'll see more fediverse instances that allow freedom of speech.

It's the useful idiots on the left who keep saying freedom speech is a dogwhistle.

Oh cool. I guess Epic is just trying to leech off of useful idiots working for free.

What a world.

Thanks for the rational response.

Great point about North Korea.

I'd say it's both.

Joe Biden didn't care any more about the working class than hillary or kamala. They are all the same person, as far as the presidency is concerned.

They were both Joe Biden with a vagina.

I just tried installing it, and apparently there's some scummy winrar-esque licensing where we have to pay or 're-activate' it every 6 hours.

I'm so fucking tired of greed and consumerism.

It's another thing we can blame greed and consumerism for.

People only make thumbnails this way because 'the data' has shown it's what makes channels more money.

Skyrim, Demon's Souls

Yes, it's a well-known fact among historians that people tend to be more accepting of differences in race than differences in sex.

Yep. It's all about breeding anyone out of the gene pool whose families are in a position to resist the ruling class.

There will be 2 kinds of people in the future: the haves, and the have-nots. Just like in the past.

We only have ourselves to blame. For decades now, we've been fighting the people who fight back instead of just simply fighting back (or doing nothing). That kind of cuck-behavior catches up with us, and now it's too late to change course.

Running a woman twice was definitely stupid on the democrats' part. Regardless of what you believe, the fact is that people are way less accepting of other sexes than other races. Any historian will confirm this; it's not a point of debate.

Instead of blaming people for not voting for a woman that represents the ruling class, we should blame everyone who made sure we don't have a candidate that represents the working class.

The democrats have shown their hand several times; they'd rather have trump than someone who fights for the working class so that's what we get.

If Kamala wins, democrats win. If trump wins, democrats still win because rich people keep getting richer while everyone else suffers.

I still blame everyone who voted for hillary clinton in the 2016 primary for why we now have 2 trump presidencies. You need to keep in mind, a lot of people voted for her in the primary specifically because she was female and it was 'her turn.' (to lose to trump)

That's the spirit.

Don't fight back because you've already accepted defeat.

You're why republicans keep winning and the working class keeps losing.

It's a two-pronged strategy.

Democrats legitimately do not care about their constituents. The role of democrats is that of a 'ratchet,' to lock-in any gains the republicans get by making sure there's no opposition to fight back.

The average person is an idiot and the 2-party system should reinforce that notion every election.

The supreme court is an illegitimate institution and every person who does not value its power takes power away from it.

Tell your friends: the supreme court is bunk.

Great. I hate all of them.

Does it tout itself as open?

I don't have much respect for the software, and even less respect for the useful idiots praising it despite never having used it.

It's my understanding that it's proprietary software, but you can use it for free and only have to pay if you make money off of a program developed with it.