Skip Navigation
Jump
*Permanently Deleted*
  • If distros signed the bootloaders with their own keys, then I would configure my system to only use those keys and not include Microsoft’s.

    2
  • Jump
    Ubuntu Desktop "Charting A Course For The Future" With Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Next Year
  • I've looked into the hardware disk encryption before. The problem that it has with Linux is it isn't compatible with secure boot OOTB and could cause sleep issues. That's just the nature of OPAL 2 disks. I'm curious to see what they will do, but then the security is up to the TPM chip and the BIOS.

    1
  • Jump
    PSA: Recent AMD fTPM fixes introduced regressions in stable and LTS kernels that are breaking TPM, presumably for everyone
  • I've had fTPM issues with the bios because I changed CPUs and lost key attestation. Maybe it's my fault, but the reset process isn't documented anywhere clearly and it's not worth digging up my old CPU to reset the Mobo.

    5
  • Jump
    Why is CalyxOS consider more private than Graphine, but Graphine is more secure?
  • Graphene has been good at getting security and feature updates out the door quicker. For that reason (and that google telemetry will happen no matter what OS), it's much more secure.

    1
  • Jump
    What is your preferred daily driver distribution?
  • I need to settle on one for a bit. I like Fedora for it’s edge stability and embracing newer secure technology. But, I will be shifting to Debian 12 or Ubuntu LTS because I need to get real work done. I like Pop and Mint, but they don’t have secure boot which I desire.

    I’ll probably enjoy arch when I get the time to play with it more.

    5