Are there precisely 37 developers in that team??
Old habits die hard, that's the first alias on my list in .zshrc!
🔥 A cross-platform build utility based on Lua. Contribute to xmake-io/xmake development by creating an account on GitHub.
Python is already popular so Mojo making that ecosystem much faster, safer and easier to deploy could be game changing when it's fully formed. There are also armies of existing Python developers out there for businesses to tap into and it's an easy language to pick up.
On their roadmap page, it looks like C++ interop is going to be a first class citizen too, further opening up the ecosystem to existing high performance libraries:
Integration to transparently import Clang C/C++ modules. Mojo’s type system and C++’s are pretty compatible, so we should be able to have something pretty nice here. Mojo can leverage Clang to transparently generate a foreign function interface between C/C++ and Mojo, with the ability to directly import functions:
from "math.h" import cos
print(cos(0))
Like how OOP was the best thing ever for everything, and just now 30 years later is proven to be actually bad.
Alan Kay coined the term 57 years ago and we have to look at the landscape back then to see just how much OOP has actually influenced pretty much all languages, including ones that distance themselves from the term now. Avoiding shared global state. Check. Encapsulating data and providing interfaces instead of always direct access. Check. Sending signals to objects/services for returned info. Check check check.
Windows shared libs could do with having an rpath
equivalent for the host app. I tried to get their manifest doohickeys working for relative locations but gave up and still just splat install them in the exe directory.
Aside from that shared libraries are great. Can selectively load/reload functions from them at runtime which is a fundamental building block of a lot of applications that have things like plugin systems or wrappers for different hardware etc. Good for easier LGPL compliance as well.
Even the phrase "Russian sympathizer" is propaganda. Simple messaging sinks in.
I just have an interest in the wars around the world that the West (the UK, USA, Israel, France) are magically omnipresent in and around. With of course completely coincidental geopolitical prizes to win, as 'we' play Team NATO World Police around the world after the first rounds of our Confessions of an Economic Hitman tactics fail. The same old players pop up in every new episode of their perpetual war plan.
This is another episode. All wrapped up in a completely independent narrative with a different cartoon mad man to fight and a nice humanitarian angle so that people get all emotionally attached and don't join the dots.
If this is anyone’s propaganda it’s Ukraine’s, in which case I’m happy to participate.
Why is that? It's a blood bath and we shouldn't support any propaganda that perpetuates wars.
I would take what our jingoistic media and talking heads say with a very large pinch of salt. It's quite disrespectful to Ukrainian soldiers to say they've been facing an "antique show of an invasion", not to mention Russian engineers. Propaganda aside, both sides have fought hard in what has been a very modern war.
Every country uses a combination of older and newer equipment in any war. The war propaganda wizards just try to make things like that look unique to Russia.
I'd never heard of that, thanks for the link!
brainfuck is a member of an exclusive club of languages where it's much easier to write a compiler for it than to read a program written in it.
I use Manjaro (kindof btw) with the Gnome desktop and didn't know there were that many. Not all are installed by default here anyway.
I'm too cynical. I hope to once again share some faith in the system again. All the best!
It's the section "Access to electronic evidence" and the talk of encryption there, with delegates pressing "lawful access by design". They aren't dreaming of lawful access to encrypted byte streams and when there's a backdoor for lawful access today, it's available for different laws tomorrow. They do seem like they are on the same page on this, which isn't surprising since it was floated onto the G7 agenda from wherever globalist policy originates from.
It looks like the US is still gunning for it, which is expected with top-down globalist policy. Yes, I'm in the UK where the last few leaders haven't been elected by the people. All perfectly normal stuff.
Unfortunately the mission to regain control of information flow is a top-down policy and the UK government is just swimming in the direction everybody is being steered to. There are several countries all implementing their own versions of this, for example India recently banning some e2ee apps. Also the EU has approved a law which requires that companies be able to scan content of user messages.
I don't know any specifics about the laws being considered in North America, or what's happening in South America, Africa or the rest of Asia at all, but I'd imagine any banned list would be pretty long by the time the dust settles. In the meantime it'll be more than a little cringe worthy watching the politicians in different countries trying to take credit for the trickle down policies they sell.
Perhaps a technical solution could be apps with backdoored encryption exposing an interface for other apps to pass and receive encrypted messages. Dividing themselves in two even. A custom text editor isn't a messaging app.
The developers aren’t trustworthy on the account of their extremist ideology...
What do you mean by that? Are they hell bent on using Rust Nightly and making overly-judicious use of .unwrap()
?
edit: I see that you mean they are Marxist-adjacent.
Hopefully Mojo will sort it all out. Maybe even inspiring a new, positive streak of xkcd strips in the future?