Not that I know of, but it wouldn’t be odd if they did because, you know, all the murder
2000 years of racism, forced displacement and oppression, capped off with one of the most horrific genocides in the history of the world. It’s almost like you just want to believe Jewish people are bad guys to fit a simpler narrative of what’s happening.
Almost a troll-like insistence on lack of nuance to an extremely complex situation
Damn what’s with this fierce binary tribalism? Can we acknowledge that it’s one of the most complicated geopolitical circumstances in the history of the world?
Or is it just “my team is the good guys and the other team is evil”?
What crazy shit were they covering up while blatantly breaking laws in public on the daily?
I believe black people’s lives matter. I hold that view so strongly that I’m willing to shout it in the streets. Does that make part of a political extremist movement?
That’s quite the false equivalence you’ve made there
I’ll take both please
Pretty sure Whole Foods had shitty conservative executives back then too didn’t they?
Is this in a museum somewhere? Would be cool to see up close
I’d subscribe to a whole community about upcoming actions/protests/marches
Because they don’t care about quality in depth content. They’re just in it for the clicks. Probably had an algorithm fill in the remaining paragraphs
Would this look any different if it displayed average salary instead of iPhone price as a percentage of average salary?
Pure speculation that Musk himself did this. I hate the guy, but I also hate journalism that offers no evidence to back up its headlines.
This seemed like a big win until I saw the graph. Holy shit either reporting changed alot, or there’s a long way to go before things are even remotely okay.
SOLVED
I see these things at construction sites pretty often and have no idea what they are for.
It’s about 5 feet tall, 2 feet wide, 2 feet deep, 3-inch wall thickness and hollow. Big circular indents on each side. They’re usually empty, sometimes with random litter inside.
What is its purpose?
Thank you. As someone who knows nothing about that religion this headline was extremely confusing to me
That’s cool. Would it kill them to show us a graph of this though? I just want to see a graph
We could theoretically subsidize our way through the cost difference until it becomes cheap enough to sustain through market mechanisms
Hello fellow tree huggers,
Question: if I have a plot of land in the Western Washington Cascades, should I plant redwoods and/or sequoias on it on not? I would do this in addition to the obvious douglas firs, western red cedars, western hemlocks and various appropriate ground shrubs/ferns.
I can see a lot of articles about "assisted migration", many of which reference redwoods, but also all of which state that the idea is controversial. The idea is that Northern California is becoming less habitable for these trees, and Washington and BC become more like how California used to be, so the redwood forest will naturally migrate northwards. However, climate change is happening too fast for a slow-moving forest to realistically keep up.
The proponents argue that it's a way to preserve an important species, especially one which is a great carbon sink.
The doubters argue that some species of plants wouldn't survive the process, or could bring pests, or at least be susceptible them.
I can't tell if those drawbacks really pertain to redwoods/sequoias in Washington though. There are hundreds of them around the Seattle area that are doing just fine, more than a hundred years after residents planted them.
What do y'all think? Do it or no?
Is there a list of carbon sequestration projects?
There seems to be a huge number of miscellaneous projects for a specific type of environmental restoration or some other activity that is specifically aimed at carbon sequestration. For example, seagrass restoration alone has a plethora(1,2,3). Is there a decent list of these projects? I found this cool list of CCS projects(4), but that’s different.
If such a list exists, I have another question: Is there an objective way to compare their effectiveness?
https://www.projectseagrass.org
https://www.medseafoundation.org/index.php/en/portfolio-ita-2/a-sea-forest-to-save-the-planet/34
https://www.seegraswiesen.de/en/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_carbon_capture_and_storage_projects
Back in 2017 the story broke that Trump and his goons tried to get damaging information on Hillary Clinton from a Russian government official. The emails were clear solicitation of foreign interference with a presidential election. You know, the whole “if it is what you say, we love it” thing, which must be illegal.
Now he’s getting indicted for some of the other blatantly illegal things he did while president. So what’s going on with that one?
I get that there were probably hundreds of illegal things he did, and some will never get prosecuted, but this seemed like one of the worst, and most red-handed of them all.
Is it just being forgotten or did I miss something?
I have a fair amount of experience with data visualization, analysis etc and thought it would be a fun project to try to visualize the Lemmy network, specifically which instances have strong links to one another via subscriptions from users in one to communities in the other.
How/where can I get that data?
EDIT: It sounds like many people would find this a violation of their data privacy and I simply shouldn’t do it. I had thought this kind of data was intended to be entirely accessible by design, but I learned something new!
With a “502 Bad Gateway” 🤪