tbh i blame parents too for bringing up children without ensuring some sort of financial security for them before they are even born, also doesn't help that abortion is getting less accessible (rich people knew which laws to tap): somone's child could be sentenced to eternal homeless and poverty if his parent didn't pull out fast enough.. what a life
making bills allowing 10 year olds to work is one step in that direction.
land of the fee!
they are pro birth for free labor, but also anti homeless. those pesky rich! rules for thee, but not for me
legality doesn't mean morality. Corporates have made moral things illegal.
i didnt watch, but probably it would imply that. calling it out publicly would be defamation and could risk prosecution, albeit video has 25 views only,
The video discusses a frustrated customer's negative experience with Shein's customer service. The customer highlights the difficulty of contacting Shein, lack of response to emails, and missing items in their package. They tl;dw: suggest that Shein should focus on improving customer service by hiring more people to handle complaints and inquiries. The video emphasizes the importance of addressing issues with missing items and replacements to retain customers and build a strong customer base.
Summarize.tech
yea, with bike better. although i would prefer an e-bike but ok
i hate richard brenson and jeff bezos because they did shit to humanity with their wealth; at least elon have put his money into some beneficial industries, and is allowed to enjoy extravageous endeavours: let the boy have fun by buying twitter, and trolling the world, let him get a taste of his money. also working in a fullfillment center isn't the same as working as an engineer for spacex: that job is physically crushing and people need to be paid well, be afforded exoskeletons, be retired early, ulike an engineer who is knwoledge is much needed and there is not much physical effort expected from his side, but again pay both accordingly
tl;dw : The video discusses wealth inequality in America, and the stark difference in wealth between those at the top and those at the bottom. It points out that, in 1976, the top 1% of Americans took home only 9% of the national income, while the bottom 50% only owned half of that. Thirty years later, the top 1% owns nearly a quarter of the national income, while the bottom 50% owns only half of that. The video also suggests that many of the wealthy people have worked hard for their money, but that the average worker needs to work more than a month to earn what the CEO makes in one hour.
https://www.summarize.tech/www.youtube.com/watch?t=6s&v=QPKKQnijnsM
earn ur first million by merit: pay people living wages and make retirement age at 50 and fund my retirement for the next 40 years beyond 50 and earn the fuck u want idc. wealth shouldnt all be centralized. at certain point wealth need to be taxed and tax revenue should be benefit other people in form of grants or something so they could also get a taste of rich life: the purpose of living is to enjoy it, not to centralize wealth to a single person
those export countries are the luckiest: probably african ones i would assume
alot of countries are going to miss their net 0 emission goal. there's no need to compromise one own life style if governements arent serious about radical change. might as well keep driving ur fossil fuel car; u can't stop private jets from flying or corproates from making extra revenue on the exepnse of the environement