This post reminds me of a friend of mine who likes a song so much, he will only listen to it twice a year, once on New Year's and once on his birthday. He says each time is like the first time because "the pathways stay fresh". He's been consistent for at least 7 years.
If you're curious: Toccata - OVERWERK
It blows my mind that this was cutting edge, jaw dropping graphics back in the day. A shape-shifting trapezoid with some panicked faces peeking out.
E. Nah now I'm thinking it's a one dimensional parallelegram.
We don't talk about the event!!
That's a 10% dip before the market even opens. Opening bell is going to be fun this morning!!
Cops are overwhelmingly bags of shit, and will use every available opportunity to demonstrate that fact, as we see here.
That said, I really think fines for traffic violations should be based on income. The guys total nonchalance at having been caught doing 60 in a 45(?) just smacks of wealth privilege. As it stands, fines only serve to yoke the poor, and do nothing to curb dangerous behavior from those who can easily afford the infraction.
Are these in pots or in the ground? Those leaves look perfect, really nice one for sure.
I guess given your response, you are asserting their managers are gatekeeping access? Do you have personal experience in that regard?
I ask because we have made a massive, and frankly dumb, push to get everyone and their mother to use ChatGPT at work, from C level down to the call centers. Our metrics show around %60 of queries come from male employees, despite only %30 of our global staff being male. Given that communications and access were given to all employees via the same global communications channels, we attributed that to more men being willing to try gimmicky new software than women, but I wonder if something else is at play...
I am having difficulty following this line of reasoning, can you please help clarify? Why would being forced to prove your worth dissuade you from using a productivity tool? Are you implying women likely don't have access to use it at all, or they don't trust the output because the stakes are too high?
It's a security\legal risk to allow adhoc wireless networks within your environment, pretty much any organization above a certain size has the same restrictions.
You could theoretically allow anyone to access your router directly, which would let them bypass agreeing to the Acceptable Use Policy, for example, shifting liability back to the organization for that users behavior.
Not true, you're pumping their numbers up, which increases their valuation.
Any bets on how long it takes before this becomes a fetish?
Besides a wealthy tithing Christian, what loser pays 100k a year to hang out in a place you can't drink or use profanity?
I heard she also didn't list any of her childhood lemonade stands on her IRS 1040 form. 🫢
I like the last one, I think having the status code in the body could help clarify where the error is coming from when traversing a reverse proxy.
You can't flush a turd that landed on the seat, he is going to run every single election until he dies.
Honestly, I love that for the Republican party. Perpetually nominating the same dildo over and over, despite losing the election by a wider margin each time.
Everything is wrong with the US government.
While simultaneously defining themselves as the arbiters of that kingship, no less.
Tbf it's a pretty damned easy shit test to pass, it's quite telling when someone won't even take a swing.