null @ null @lemmy.nullspace.lol

Posts

0

Comments

91

Joined

7 days ago

Except it did happen.

And it was disgusting.

Remember when you said that women calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience are bigots?

Oof, that was gross.

I feel great about outing a woman-hater.

Oh yeah, so big time mommy issues!

Like what kind of scrutiny?

I bet that's it. Mommy didn't pay enough attention to little Danny growing up, and now you get this.

Lol what? Are you saying Substack is the only blogging platform that exists?

What is this, the Headgum Podcast?

I wonder what started you down this path of hating women so much.

I'm gonna bet it's mommy-issues.

So you were lying. I never said that. What a surprise!

Woman-hater and a liar. What else will you reveal yourself to be!

Where did I agree to that?

you’re comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.

Max depth reached.

Oh now I’m a sexist, I’d to hear that story if you’re going to talk at me anyway.

Sure, it starts here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/61891

Thanks. Any other anti-women takes of yours you want to share with the room? I think it's best we get them all out there.

Help! Help! I'm being forced to engage in an argument I can literally stop having at any time!

Lol.

Okay, so we can assume that's a yes then.

So again, to rewind waaaaaayyyyy back: pretty wild that you're comfortable calling women bigots for calling out one of the most common forms of misogyny they experience.

Real incel-level take, but you do you.

read the comments

I did. Based on them, your answer would be: Yes. You think a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist: “Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way”.

Is that correct?

So you're saying a woman using this sentence would be a bigot/misandrist?

"Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way"

You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.

I didn't think you needed my permission to tuck your tail between your legs and run away. But you have it: you're totally free to stop replying whenever you want.

Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic

I'm saying you're wrong that I equate these 2:

Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.

Bill mansplained baseball to me.

The first would have to be "Bill explained baseball to me in a misogynistically condescending way"

I’ll restate this again according to you.

Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.

Bill mansplained baseball to me.

These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.

Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being "misogynistically condescending"? I'm happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it's there somewhere.