There’s no way they will sentence a sitting president.
Wrong. The only viable way to fix this is to vote for Kamala today to avoid further genocide, and then for candidates who support RCV in all the downballot elections. That builds support for a proper election format at a local, then state, then national level.
It’s not a trolley problem if you aren’t given a choice to pull the lever. There is no viable candidate who fights against super pacs.
It’s not hard to max out when doing simulations in Blender, but I know I have a niche use case.
The problem with this is always cost. That looks just as expensive to fire, if not moreso, than the drone it shoots down.
Me too. High five! (But not like, in person. Because I’m not leaving my house.)
Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.
I mean, yeah it’s hypocritical, he has several sexual harassment lawsuits open against him IIRC.
That being said, in your example, it would be Mormons criticizing Mormons for their belief, not ex-Mormons criticizing ex-Mormons.
It’s never wrong to speak the truth, even if you’re on the wrong side of it.
And if it’s federal, Trump can pardon it, assuming he wins.
Republicans have learned that “states rights” can also mean you can get prosecuted in those states and there’s not a damn thing the federal government can do about it.
I guess I didn’t explain very well. Basically there are some things which are still impossible even if you change the rules. This remains true even beyond full control of the properties of the universe.
Yeah, there are literally thousands of legitimate reasons to hate Musk. Calling out former friends for their behavior… isn’t really one of them.
Instead hate him because he’s actively promoting discrimination against trans people, or because he’s eroding democracy through illegal lotteries, or because he regularly manipulates the stock market, or pushing the great replacement theory, or…
Right, but 1+1 still cannot equal to 3 in that video game. You could do all kinds of horrible tricks to make it seem so, but they are just that - tricks.
Paradoxes are by definition impossible, even in a modified version of physics.
The hard part is that “direct” is subjective and up to interpretation of the court.
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.
But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.
They don’t need to go that far. Just force Musk to divest. (And prosecute him for any crimes he’s committed, but that might be asking too much of the government.)
To be fair, I think the majority of stand up comedians are also painful to listen to.
But you’re right, this is an exaggerated caricature of reality, like Monty Python or the Three Stooges but far less so.
Indeed, it turns out that high quality content is high effort, and therefore has a weaker ROI. I know it’s simply game theory, I just hate this particular game.
When will humans stop enjoying painfully staged videos like this? Like, who tilts the object away from themself but towards the camera to check why it’s not working?