THERE'S BLOOD IN THE BOX
That's how you get Magna Carta where the aristocrats, the most powerful people, go to the king and say, we want power too.
Tell me you don't know what the Magna Carta is without saying you don't know what the Magna Carta is.
he's literally correct about what the magna carta is
And now everyone pokes at it like it was ever supposed to be literature, with any serious thought behind it.
terf lady doesn't help herself by incessantly insisting that everything was planned from the very start
just repeat nonsense like a broken record
👀
explained to you the fallacy of your argument in detail
this is a really interesting way of phrasing "i repeated variations of 'no that's wrong' over and over again"
i'm still waiting on your explanation of why your post isn't just a variation on "marxism good because i think it good"
Enjoy having the last word being the child that you are.
ACTUALLY heartbreaking that this is over for us we had such a good thing going
you're probably the most prolific pro-marxism poster on the site and when you scratch the surface even slightly it turns out your brain is full of wood shavings it's probably not a good look bby
yeah, but it still specifically protected barons, not the common person
when he says this:
That's how you get Magna Carta where the aristocrats, the most powerful people, go to the king and say, we want power too
he's correct
dropping the emojis again i love it
your post boils down to "marxism good because i say", which is a shit argument for marxism
there's really nothing more to it than that, and it's pretty obvious that you've realised it at this point
hence how pointedly you're avoiding actually engaging with anything i say and i'm here for it every step of the way
it's hilarious that you think that has anything to do with your post
ah and thus we arrive at the final stop of our journey
"the right answer is right because i say it is right", confirming that, at no stage did you have anything resembling a good point to make in its defense
i'm glad we could all reach this together i'm so happy for us
oh my god it was beautiful
it was nearly an argument and then it just crashed and burned so quickly, and it was so clearly meant to be some kind of coup de grâce
reasoning about the actual mechanics, and thinking through their implications
okay so if a person grows up in the wrong environment, and so they reason about the actual mechanics, and think through the implications in a way that you don't like, it's bad
but when they do it and get an answer that you do like, it's good
the only difference between the two scenarios is your personal opinion on their conclusion
excuse me buddy i think you need to work on your
reading comprehension
let's try again
can you trust a person's gut reaction? yes or no?
oh my god is that the point you were trying to make? i kind of assumed it wasn't because it actually doesn't help your argument in any way
like, okay, you're shaped by your surroundings. so? so you can't trust your gut because your surroundings could have shaped you to have the wrong gut reaction?
incredible that you're actually arguing against yourself now
the magna carta protected the rights of some barons, not the common people, so he's actually correct
my guy it's actually comical how shit your comebacks are getting
can you trust it? yes or no? it's a pretty simple question
can you trust a gut reaction or not? i'm getting mixed messages here
have you forgotten what your point was? because a minute ago it was that you could trust the average person's gut impulse when it came to political philosophy. now it's that you can't? are you feeling okay?
*taps the sign*
Donald Trump, a fascist, is currently polling about equally with his opponent, who is not a fascist, because while his policies are fascist, he isn't describing them as such. People are willingly voting for them because they think they're a good idea.
If he campaigned on "I am a fascist", he would not be polling equally with his opponent.
Please explain how these two ideas put together aren't an example of what you advocate for in your post.
You'll also notice that me referencing polling figures doesn't mean that I agree with the outcome of polling. Absolutely shocking that I need to make this clarification, but there we go, I suppose.
Or, you know, continue desperately avoiding making an actual argument because of how obvious it is that you accidentally made a pro-fascism, pro-eugenics post and for some reason can't accept that fact.
don't make me tap the sign
also to preempt pls nobody do the intellectually dishonest thing of pretending me following this line of argument means im in love with eugenics and am here to argue for more eugenics or that i just dont think eugenics is such a bad thing after all thnk u
on the other hand, your post advocates for fascism and eugenics