because ideology in general is less about its policies, there’s always going to be a diverse range of ways to approach things even with set intentions and concepts! it’s way more about its mode of thinking
a pro-social mode focuses mostly on finding its ideal version of outcome intent via political structure while hyper-individualism operates on a sort of hierarchal appropriateness. in any hierarchy where the hierarchy is the point, a policy or reality is good or bad because it includes the “right” people in their decision making process or as the target in accordance with the chosen form of deservedness
the meritocracy of capital is a secularization of god through the visage of his invisible hand. a CEO, then, is divinely mandated by virtue of its place. their position isn’t subject to impact, it defines the map
because ideology in general is less about its policies, there’s always going to be a diverse range of ways to approach things even with set intentions and concepts! it’s way more about its mode of thinking
a pro-social mode focuses mostly on finding its ideal version of outcome intent via political structure while hyper-individualism operates on a sort of hierarchal appropriateness. in any hierarchy where the hierarchy is the point, a policy or reality is good or bad because it includes the “right” people in their decision making process or as the target in accordance with the chosen form of deservedness
the meritocracy of capital is a secularization of god through the visage of his invisible hand. a CEO, then, is divinely mandated by virtue of its place. their position isn’t subject to impact, it defines the map