Aktuell ist so weit ich weiß eine penetrante Warnung, die bei jedem Start manuell deaktiviert werden muss Pflicht bei Neuwagen. Damit kommst du aber nicht an die Fahrys von Gebrauchtwagen.

Und meinetwegen auch die Richtgeschwindigkeit als Maximum für Fahranfänger, die 90km/h sind aber nicht so ideal. Dann drängeln bei denen die älteren Fahrer.

Zumindest der Name war heute mal Programm.

User auf der Plattform X

Im Gegensatz zu Plattform Y /s

Als Vorschläge dafür gibt es bereits Entgendern nach Phettberg mit -y/-ys (Schüly/Schülys) und den dialektartigen Vorschlag von https://geschlechtsneutral.net/ mit -e/-ne (Schülere / Schülerne)

Hast du dir auch schon MagicEarth angeschaut und kannst es damit vergleichen?

“Protecting our community," by destroying it. If you don't have a community, then it can't be toxic. Were the comments so bad that this was the only solution?

Hmm, i think I mixed it up with the config. There is an all option in swayimgrc.

That article mixes up SUID and sudo and implies the grace period is bad, but disregards its configurability. I'm also not sure what advantages the context isolation brings if the process runs as root. sudo is copying some environment data because users want that, much of that can be disabled ...

You can make it work mostly that way. Create a UKI (unified kernel image including EFI stub loader, kernel, initial filesystem and kernel parameters), then tell uefi to directly boot it. The four steps still run, but using only a single file.

There is some difference I see in the management layer, with more dynamic resource allocation in a cloud infrastructure compared to traditional data center usage.

I think the --all option is this mode.

At least on xorg the gifs I had worked.

Exactly what I expected from them. The same interests that want chat control are here as well.

Exactly what I expected from them. The same interests that want chat control are here as well.

This sort of thing is the reason that the kernel has its own cve authority / cna now.

It's interesting, that it would be hard to make a case that there was a "vulnerability" in the ip package. But it seems like this package's entire purpose is input validation so it's kind of weird the dev thinks otherwise.

Yes, input validation, probably for forms. What the Dev disputes is that he cannot see a case where it is used in a security critical way where

1. the input format is unknown and
2. it is essential to know if the IP is public or private.

I don't know how it compares to nsxiv, but imv supports Wayland.

From your quote using an AI through the internet to get that image is already illegal, only for local AI there could be some argument.

I am shocked that Facebook employees even see this as a vulnerability. I always considered metadata the valuable part of WhatsApp.

A separate routing table that takes precedence over the one modified by DHCP should works as well I think. Oh, and of course you have to use a vpn that forces its own nameserver or set one manually to prevent redirections.