smegforbrains @ smegforbrains @lemmy.ml

Posts

5

Comments

144

Joined

2 yr. ago

That's not a helpful argument to support your opinion

IMHO not offering arguments or credible sources make you're opinion moot.

I'm not trying to have a conversation I'm trying to have s civil discussion

That's evasion again. Please try supporting your arguments with credible sources or arguments next time.

You maybe but I am not. I will keep asking you for arguments or credible sources to support your opinion or to undermine mine.

Again I'm not trying to have an argument. I'm trying to convince you to engage in a civil discussion. And I do think it's very healthy to support opinions with arguments and sources instead of evasion and personal attacks.

So try to elaborate what kind of opinion your trying to support when you say "Have a gold star". It's this in support of your opinion or is it to undermine mine?

I don't keep responding for your sake. I think you misinterpreted my intentions.

I don't understand what you are trying to say

Yes and I have cited your other comments as well. That's what a credible source is.

And btw calling my point dumb is IMHO a personal attack. Next time try something like: I don't think your point is valid, because...[insert argument]

So calling me "unable to read" and"unable to comprehend" and all of Germany imbeciles is not a personal attack. I beg to differ.

I don't want to have an argument: I want to have a discussion with arguments offered, sources cited and less logical fallacies and personal attacks.

Yes I do think so. My opinion is that you don't know how to have a civil discussion. I think you should read that very carefully, since you succumb to logical fallacies all the time and do not provide arguments or cite credible sources in support of your opinion.

"I think that your point is dumb". Next time try something like: "I think your point is not valid" and it won't be a personal attack.

And you are entitled to yours. And I offered arguments and IMHO credible sources to support my view and undermine yours. You did not. So your simply stating an opinion but you do not engage in a discussion.

Did you read that? Do you have a counter argument to offer? Are you willing to engage in a civil discussion?

Yes but still no argument and still just a personal attack.

I don't think that's true. Instead of offering arguments to support your point in a civil discussion you called me "unable to read", all of Germany "imbeciles" and so on, without ever addressing other opinions or supporting yours with credible sources or arguments

That's why Germany wants to phase out coal next after nuclear energy production has been phased out in 2023. In 2038 coal is planned to be completed passed out and be replaced by climate neutral energy consisting of renewables and green hydrogen gas power plants until 2045.

BTW mining uranium is in no way better than mining coal: https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/what-are-health-and-environmental-impacts-mining-and-enriching-uranium

Hers a little primer on the differences of discussion and arguments: https://langeek.co/en/grammar/course/1069/argument-vs-discussion

You were clearly arguing, while I was trying to keep the discussion civil by citing sources and offering data and arguments to support my opinion.