Republicans just need to attach their trans extermination legislation to bills that fund the military or other key government functions, and the Dems will vote for it in large numbers.
Yeah, it sucks when that happens; then if the Dems don't vote for it, it gets framed by the Republicans as they only care about LGBTQ issues.
edit: For what it's worth, have a look at this:
Democrats will lean on this tactic to take on Trump during his second term
Understood; I'm referring strictly to damage control.
After what happened in November, baby steps in two years are preferable to nothing for four.
Indeed; it was more or less a rhetorical question.
at least for the next four years
Maybe two if enough people get off their asses and vote during the midterms.
Can anyone explain how this waste of taxpayer dollars is "conservative"?
"We're sorry to inform you that an intellectual property claim has been filed by UnitedHealth Group Inc against this design of yours on TeePublic"
If UnitedHealth really filed that claim, they're even more tone-deaf than I thought.
This is a replica, built in 1930, of a late-1800s cable car:
Nowadays we associate the cable car only with San Francisco, but there were cable car installations in thirty different US cities, and Chicago had the largest.
The cable could not cross a bridge that opened, so three tunnels had to be dug under the Chicago River to allow cable cars into downtown. And to avoid having cable lines cross each other, the cable cars had to run left-handed on State St. and on Wabash in the middle of the Loop.
more details here
If more women opened a Bible instead of their legs
That's why your a good woman
(bold added for emphasis)
This guy needs to open a dictionary.
As an aside, I have bad news for the person who downvoted almost every comment here: Downvotes are disabled and not viewable in lemmy.blahaj.zone, and they don't count toward the vote total. Sorry, weirdo.
Wow, that's one hell of a coincidence.
/s
Musk looks like he's trying to escape people in white coats who are chasing him with butterfly nets.
Why would anyone in their right mind want the government to be even more involved in people's personal lives? It's bad enough as it is.
edit: This story is from 2018 and hasn't appeared in any credible news outlets, with no updates since then, so it's most likely bullshit.
Just go to the Wikipedia entry for gangrene and view the images; all I did was post a link to it.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
> "When you elect a president of one party, often, states of the party that oppose that president have enormous ability to try to block or push back on directions that the president might want to go, especially if Congress can't function or pass legislation," said Barry Rabe, a public policy professor at the University of Michigan's Ford School and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroliner
> The special session responds to the public statements and proposals put forward by President-elect Trump and his advisors, and actions taken during his first term in office — an agenda that could erode essential freedoms and individual rights, including women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights. A special session allows for expedited action that will best protect California and its values from attacks. The special session will begin December 2, when the Legislature convenes.