Oh that makes sense, I don’t know why I couldn’t figure it out.

What is the last word of your comment supposed to be?

The article says it’s $92.17

The first paragraph of the article says $92.

Not really meant for self hosting, but have you looked at listenbrainz? The software and data is open and it’s not a commercial service.

I use organic maps and it works really well

There’s more air resistance at higher speeds.

For clarity, I’m assuming you meant “accused” or “tried” rather than “convicted.”

By mass or by volume?

That means that the UK has actually provided about 20% more aid as a fraction of their GDP (0.212%) compared to the US (at 0.173%).

What do you mean, “better link”?

Storing it as a sparse graph should reduce the storage requirements drastically, since most edges wouldn’t exist.

They also don’t get access to all the data that I think is most invasive (federated or not). I expect my posts, comments, votes, and follows on a public forum to be public. I don’t expect which posts I open, which comments I read, and how long I view each one for (a much larger and more invasive pool of data) to be public, and that’s what I don’t want Meta to get. By not using threads, they don’t get that. By using threads (or any Meta product) they do get that, and they probably use it to shovel more ads in your face.

While I am a little cautious of the possibility of EEE, I feel like the majority of fediverse users are anti-corporation and relatively technically informed, and would anticipate any attempts to extinguish it would be poorly received and ineffective. (Edit: although I do think this argument is reasonable and haven’t really decided whether I think federating with threads is a good idea)

Either way, federating with threads won’t give them any non-public information, which is substantially better than if you used their products directly. The other information is there for anyone to grab, so it’s kind of weird to complain about them reading it. If you put up a sign in your yard, you wouldn’t complain about people who walk by reading it.

I believe Canada allows religious marriage (you don’t have to get a marriage license in that case, it’s not a civil ceremony).

Edit: you can also have a civil marriage ceremony, which is also legally valid

That is true in the US, but there are many counties where religious marriage is legal marriage.

Why not just call it a community?

I usually call the CPU cores physical cores and logical cores. So a CPU might have 6 physical cores and 12 logical cores. Meaning that it has 6 real cores, but it shows up as 12 because of hyper threading.

That makes sense, personally I would consider nonbeliever to be only people who don’t follow any religion, but I can see how it is more up to interpretation.

I understand that, but if someone says they are “Jewish by birth and nonbeliever by belief,” I would think they would be in the ethnic group but not the religion, as opposed to someone who does also practice the religion.

Wouldn’t that be an ethnicity then, and not a religious identity?