I'm not sure because I don't use the platform. Monero being a privacy-focused community kinda negates the potential of this inquiry as well, but I am curious about what led to this question as well.
We use it to gain/aid a growing audience. Same reason/function as the monero discord server.
Is that yt link with '?si' tracking on monero lemmy? Disappoint...
Well it doesn't look like a grillout
Question: Why is BSD so low? (And why/what is unknown?)
This is awesome and quite comprehensive, but I have an additional question:
What if I would like to contribute and I do know programming but still don't know where to start? I'm familiar and have done small projects with everything except Dart. How does one prioritize what is needed most right now? Should I just attack whatever I enjoy most or is some work desperately needed more than others?
How is this different from nostr out of curiosity? Also, is that the dude?
Link? Just curious
The problem with your demands, is that the second I did show you exactly what you are requesting, you would simply shrug away my evidence as inauthentic. "That's not a real left wing community" Isn't that the Leftist motto, "That wasn't real communism/socialism"
But this is also what I'm trying to convey about 4chan. Its merely an anonymous image board of stupidity for the large majority of its users. This makes it an easy target for sensitive individuals who refuse to do their own field research.
How does such a plain question appear insincere? Especially when no one even addresses my second question? lmao
Just because deepfake technology exists doesn’t mean that that all video and audio recordings are immediately untrustworthy.
Are you sure? I only ask because you didn't really provide any kind of logic to justify this claim. If we can artificially generate anything we can imagine, how are we to distinguish what recordings are authentic vs artificially generated? I don't see a clear or easy solution to the dilemma, but am hoping others can shine light on the issue.
Because literally only one does. There is no bothsides here.
Why are you so confident that you are correct here? Have you literally examined every facet of the internet?
I'm not questioning the goodness of anything. I'm just curious to see where your confidence stems from to demonize a whole collective of people beyond redemption. You'd think we'd get past this kind of ideology after WWII, y'know?
wow, what a way to demonize a group of people you don't understand. How does one achieve the naivety to believe only a single political faction operates like this? I have bad news for you comrades. We were all incels once. Don't give up on others--the 'alt-right' suffers the same as we do. I also have to point out the blatant hypocrisy of disavowing 'toxic internet culture' in the most toxic and myopic way possible 😆
Scrolled through every comment looking for this. Thanks comrade!
I urge anyone downvoting these comments to refute Steve. Downvoting without honest criticism is just petty
This is shocking to hear. I'm also extremely spooked that no experts have even attempted to dispute these claims. Was he really just some pseudo-academic celebrity? Is he merely the OG Jordan Peterson?
I have been considering this for awhile. I'm also assuming this is the largest reason why lemmy's growth hasn't been what we all wanted lool
Stupid question. I don't doubt the record is authentic, but how do we talk about 'recordings' in the age of rampant deepfake ai? There's no trustworthy method of validating these claims, right?
That's og Tony hawk pro skater map 1 without a grind rail in the middle!?!?
With the lastest news of AI layoffs, I'm struggling to understand how the idea of a career still holds. If careers themselves effectively become gambles like lottery tickets, how do we maintain drive and hopes in the longterm endgame of our struggles?
I know AI as an honest utility is itself a lie to some extent, but this only aids my argument further. People's career struggles are panning out to be valueless because of a nothing-fad that no one could have predicted.
"one of those programs so old its...syntax got standardized before command line syntax standards were established." --This is wild to learn, but also confusing. How does tar not take leading hyphens, but I've only ever used it as such without error of any kind? Not even bragging I've been doing that for 10+ years too lol
I definitely still killed us all, but at the same time how are you supposed to know any of the filenames if none are given from the comic? I guess my real answer is to 'tar -xvf' then hit tab with hopes of decent file completion functionality lol