When did he say they were inefficient in their messaging?

Also it requires shipping oil to fuel the mining operations needed to produce full scale renewable energy. But if we wait a little bit the quality of power output from the same mining inputs will improve which means renewable later requires less total mining than full scale renewable now, and so you will use less fuel to do that smaller amount of mining.

What people don't realize is that the expense of renewable technology mostly is fuel. Fuel to mine it, fuel to move the raw materials, fuel to refine it, fuel to manufacture it, fuel to ship it to you. The total labor is quite small. So if taken on a specific case the financial perspective alone of a particular application of renewable vs conventional energy the numbers don't add up then likely the renewable is less green. If you wait a little bit for the green cost to come down that indicates improved efficiencies and now it actually is green.

So the answer to make the world more green is not to shift our calculations to spend money on green solutions beyond financial sense. It's to work on technology to lower green costs until it naturally makes sense and thereby also make it more green at the same time.

But at least the ships need a non-renewable source. And they are going to need some of it in every country they visit. How do we get oil to every country if not by ship? That's a lot of pipelines if we go that route. But maybe that is the answer.

What if I told you 90% of humans do that.

Professional thought minders want to control what you see. They can vote but don't speak because the dishonestly of their thought control would be uncovered the second their motives enter conversation.

Once you see what you are not allowed to know you now know what you need to know. Look for other high positive comment high downvote threads and you'll catch the pattern.

I'll spell it out. At least one type of supressed info that might be at play here. There are minders here who work for the democrat party (like the organization). So if the democrats are in office you can't criticize anything the government does even on an anarchy forum. Anyone here should know there isn't a decent person in either of the political parties. Decency transcends working in that system. Yet a democrat government is beyond reproach on an anarchy forum even though they aren't really our allies. Really they are within reproach in conversation because the commenters are real people and we know what's up. But the workers bees can't have it and they target suppression marked information with either bots or manual voting.

So that's why there are downvotes. Someone in the current government did that. And there are thoughtless cowards here who think they have more responsibility to defend a left of center government (kind of) than to defend community self organization (which should be the higher value).

This is why pirating is justified. If you want your shows to last forever, torrent them, and keep them seeded.

Any cause benefited by stupidity is not a good cause. And that does apply to both sides.

Kamala should do a long interview with Fox, and Trump should do a long interview with MSNBC. It's what would be good for the American people.

It usually involves trying to start some shit with Russia.

It also doesn't make much sense in the particular context considering on a genetic level Palestinians are as Semitic as modern Ashkenazi jews. And it doesn't make much sense from a religious stand point because modern Judaism differs from ancient Judaism by about the same amount as Christianity or Islam does. Modern Judaism just has this dogma that Ancient Judaism was secretly observing their form of it even though if we don't take them at their word there isn't a lot of evidence of that.

So from a religious standpoint it doesn't make a lot of sense. And from an ethnic standpoint it makes even less sense.

And also we don't let Europeans say "these are our ethnic lands" without calling them racist. So then why would we let people who are like 2% ethnic ancient jewish retroactively claim ethnic ownership of some land without calling them racist? They will claim it's not about race and about religion. Ok, which is worse, a group of highly militant ethno-nationalists, or a group of highly militant theo-nationalists? Zionists are always one of two bad things and they will use arguments to play wackamole about which one to deflect the claims of one. Apparently if you are two bad things at once and it is unclear if you are both or just one of those things you get unlimited license to be both of those bad things.

I wonder what the curve for that looks like.

If you think Rust has zero rough edges you might have drunk too much kool aid.

So then animal sacrifice is meant to be continued by Christians? The "did not come to abolish but fulfill" thing is really an explanation for abolishment. He didn't destroy the law but completed it, so it's done. And by law we basically mean Leviticus. So yes, Leviticus pretty much is irrelevant. By your argument and the argument embedded in OPs post Christians should still be stoning women and not eating pork.

How can you know which chapter of Matthew starts the sermon on the mount and not know pretty much the most core concept in Christian theology? Like that is almost the whole central point of Jesus is that he abolished the law by fulfilling it. That and salvation. That's like the two things.

Of course then why doesn't Israel do this?

decicelsisus. It would only be 0.1kC when water is boiling. That's not very fun.

Exactly. And you aren't a terrorist after you win your country back. That's like the British partnering with America to fight terrorism being ironic because of George Washington. Different era is different era. Whether people like it or not the Taliban run an actual government.

Is one of them Israel and other foreign governments? Also Pfizer?

Then for one day for no reason at all the cyber trucks rose up and...

I think that cuck's name is Whistlin Diesel.

There is no such thing as a politician who is a good person. People get into politics because their appetite for corruption strengthens like a drug user. This is true of pretty much every person who has ever run for president or has been president.