We have re-invented trains for the 500th time. Good job world.
243What about trains underground?
Maybe even powered by electricity.
94Is this "ThE lOop"?
43
Is that like crabification for vehicles?
38But this time, it's different!
23My trains have black jack and hookers.
16But it's an even worse version because with it the traffic on rail networks would explode, the complexity of the unit that moves everything increases (as well as cost), and it pisses away all the efficiency trains get from economies of scale. A 2 mile train will always be more efficient than this crap. And that's all before you consider the safety nightmare that this would cause.
12
This is how you get the US to finally agree on a large scale train system: can them trucks.
122Rail trucks.
Hell, they could probably get away with re-marketing
trainsrail trucks by talking about how much horsepower they have, how big they are, and how they can even pull other cars in a single line.71The us has a large scale train system (for freight.) the key will be to convince people who currently drive trucks (vehicles used to move freight) that trains are bigger and more phallic and thus a better method of compensation.
27Doesn't the US already have a massive freight rail network though?
12
What if you link a whole bunch of them together, and then instead of having each cart be self propelled, you could have one car that pushes all of the linked cars at once? Sounds way more efficient to me. If only there was a name for a long chain of linked cars...
38HyperRailTrackerCarGroup™
I am now taking on investors.
9This guy is onto something!
2
From these comments it seemed like no one actually read what these are for? It actually makes a lot of sense to use existing, underutilized railway to deliver loads that would not require full train setups. This isn’t really a cars/trucks thing and I do blame Arstechnica for writing that shitty headline.
36Yes, however, a lot of these rail lines have been needlessly abandoned and replaced with road shipping. Road shipping isn't really cheaper, they just get to put $10 of operational cost on the taxpayer for every $1 they spend. You're basically subsidizing artificially cheap shipping. Rail is the single most efficient means that we have of moving just about anything, but it's not as heavily taxpayer subsidized, and therefor not stonks. The correct answer would be to put those $10 of operational cost back on long and mid haul trucking companies and rebuild our freight rail networks, which, even without switching to electric trains, would significantly reduce emissions, make our roads safer, and drastically reduce long term maintenance costs on our highway infrastructure.
31You have my vote, Mr. President!
2Not sure if you are saying that this is what we should be doing because that is what the article is suggesting. Using rail in a more efficient manner, not roads.
2
Of course not, they're just going to make twenty different posts talking about genitals, as if that's a priority for semi truck drivers.
3The biggest reason why companies use trucks instead of trains is that you can fill a semi truck and send it off a lot quicker than you can fill a whole train. I think rail cars capable of individual operation would work great in place of semis, because you get all the benefits of the smaller size, but you could also link them up into full trains for efficiency when possible.
1But is is also a response to the train union striking? Just automate most of them.
1
Adam Something on YouTube:
It's like a train, but shittier, like a bus, but shittier, like a tram, but shittier...
23That video was the first thing I thought of :)
(https://youtu.be/YUpST_cQ1hM for anyone wondering)
4
That sounds like a horrible idea logistically, you still need to ship stuff from a cargo terminal to the location its needed and putting single containers on rail as their own "train" makes traffic a absolute nightmare there will never not be some kind of truck unless we can Teleport shit around or airships become a cheap, fast and reliable option.
22Mandatory Adam Something in this thread :)
6
The problem is mostly that we don't build rail spurs in industrial areas anymore. If we did, then these cars could detach from trains at a shunting yard, and split up to head to all their different destinations individually. But the only last-mile infrastructure we currently have is roads.
2
I have nothing intelligent to add, but I just want to say that I sincerely hate cars. This sub isn't a joke to me, I wish those god damn things were never invented.
I'm tired of breathing their cancer-causing fumes, I'm tired of the honking and screeching, I'm tired of worrying I'll get run over just walking around my neighborhood, I'm tired of micro plastics in my brain because some fat asshole was too lazy to ride a bike, I'm tired of climate change threatening global stability. Sorry for the rant.
14Very well said! No apology necessary.
4
Now stop me if you've heard this before, but what if... and this is just a thought, don't get too worked up... but what if instead of just one of those, we hooked a bunch of them together and pulled them with something?
13I'm not sure we have the technology to achieve such greatness, but if we did, we could call it a TRAnsportation Innovation Network or TRAIN for short.
7HOLY SHIT GIVE THIS GUY A CONTRACT!
4
In before someone in the US calls it CoMmUNiSm!
12
8This guy gets it.
2
America doesn't seem to want trains unless they're either cars or way too complicated.
8It seems The Onion's article headline everytime there is a school shooting applies here, '"There's no way to prevent this!" says only country where this happens.'
3Doesn't America have a huge amount of rail freight though?
2
- 8
Preesh
2
