Enlightenment was such a cool window manager. Shame the development pace was (and still is) slow and it never really took off.
41I think even Samsung was funding it for a while. They took a long time building libraries supporting rendering on X11 what I remember. I used the 0.16.x version with my 1GHz Athlon years ago, it was very cool.
19I believe they actually adopted it for their Tizen OS, unless I completely invented that memory.
2
Is there even someone left?
I only tried it around 2008 or so and it was extremely slow paced back then while looking like the interface from a sci-fi movie.
12
I love seeing these screenshots of old Linux distributions as it makes me realize how much things have improved.
I’m just a consumer but I really appreciate the work everyone has done and I ain’t going back to Windows anymore.
19I ran enlightenment for a long time. It was great.
15If there was an updated version these days i'd be fully inclined to run it, haven't followed the project in more than a decade though
2
That was probably close to one of the last versions of enlightenment I used regularly. It was such a fun WM to use at the time. If I remember correctly, GNOME and KDE were really ramping up about then and e fell behind.
15TRANSPARENT TERMINALS! Haha it felt so futuristic and to this day I can't run a terminal without a little transparency. Enlightenment was my first experience of it.
13I mostly use it because it looks nice, but I've found that with limited screen space, they're actually really useful! I can have the man pages or a stack exchange open in the background, and don't need to constantly switch back and forth
5
I ran Storm Linux for a short while in about.... 2001-2002. Got it on a CD in a misc pack of disks from some Linux distro vendor.
It was supposed to be a server oriented distro, secured more than others, and ran Enlightenment for a desktop. Overall, it was a reasonable distro, but didn't gain enough general support and devs to keep it up and running. The group behind it folded after a short while.
11Do you ever miss something you've never had?
8It looks quite usable, to be honest. I would have loved to use it back then.
6I really enjoyed the diversity of WM/DE back then, and the innovation when new ones like Enlightenment were released!
2E was one of the best. They even created their own sound subsystem, ESD, which became the de facto default for Linux desktop sound for quite a while.
2
I have to say these desktops look to damn confusing
3What are you confused by?
4There are way too many bars that look like dockable windows, the stuff at the bottom. Lots of stuff looking like decorations (but in general these buttons are confusing af even macOS is better than that.
And at the top it looks like the whole desktop is a window with decoration??
In general low contrast, too many strange thin things, no clear icons.
1
Text rendering sure has come a long way. Those topic links look absolutely horrendous.
3Well also, 1024x768 was wicked sweet at the time
3
